Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;18:39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02629-1

Table 4.

Details of reviewed studies about ichthyosis according to location, sample, method design and significant outcomes

Setting Method Results Study quality
Ref. Location N Design Tools Comparator(s) IV(s) DV(s) Significant outcomes
Wren et al. [95] Wales 371 (54 XLI♂; 83 ♀XLI-carrier; 82 IV; 152 psoriasis) Cross-sectional—quantitative (moderate) Questionnaires (CISI, PASI, K10; ASRS; AQ10; BITE; DLQI; FSQ) 1116–18,700 non-affected subjects, students or outpatients (extractions from other studies) Condition group; skin disease severity Mood/neurodevelopmental traits; Skin-disease-specific QoL; stigmatization

All groups: psychological distress↑ (i.e. depression↑; anxiety↑) vs. non-affected subjects***

All groups: atypical neurodevelopmental trait↑ (i.e. ASD↑; ADHD↑) vs. non-affected subjects*

IV ♀: ichthyosis severity↑ ↔ recent adverse mood symptoms↑*

Main factors influencing XLI & IV mood: stigma / bullying; embarrassment of social situation; reduced social life (esp.♂-depression); difficulty regulating body temperature (esp.♀-irritability); skin related discomfort & difficulties w/ treating ichthyosis (esp.♀-irritability & ♂-anxiety)

Moderate
Abeni et al. [94] Italy 94 (including 52 subjects < 18 yrs) Cross-sectional—quantitative (low) Questionnaires (DLQI; FBI) N/A Biomedical datas; Ichthyosis severity & symptoms Skin-disease-specific QoL; Family burden

QoL↓ ↔ Disease severity↑* (e.g. fissures*, itch**, recurrent infections**, walking problems**)

QoL aspects impacted = itch & pain*, embarrassment & self-consciousness*, problems w/ clothing choice*, problems caused by treatment*

Family burden↑ ↔ Disease severity↑* (e.g. thick scales*, fissures*, or foul smell*) + harlequin & lamellar ichthyosis**

Psychological dimension of Family burden were the most impacted*

Moderate
Cortès et al. [97] Mexico 26 (only LI) Cross-sectional—quantitative (moderate) Questionnaires (CISI; DBI-II; DLQI) 26 non-affected subjects Ichthyosis severity Depression; Skin-disease-specific QoL

LI patients’ depression↑ vs. non-affected subjects***

No correlations between ichthyosis severity ↔ depression / QoL

Moderate
Sun et al. [93] USA 181 (including 53 subjects < 17 yrs) Cross-sectional—quantitative (low) Questionnaires (DLQI; PHQ-9; GAD-7) N/A Biomedical datas (e.g. ichthyosis features) Skin-disease-specific QoL; Depression; Anxiety

Adults w/ ichthyosis: QoL impairments (95%); depression + (34%); anxiety + (27%)

Adults w/ ichthyosis: Leisure impairment ↔ depression↑***; anxiety↑*

Adults w/ ichthyosis: Difficulties at work ↔ anxiety↑*

Moderate
Dreyfus et al. [90] France 241 (including 70 subjects < 18 yrs) Cross-sectional—quantitative (low) Questionnaires (VAS; DLQI) N/A Medical care; out-of-pocket expenses; work/school/leisure activities; Ichthyosis severity Skin-disease-specific QoL

Medical care: regularly followed by a physician (90%); no feedback about genetic tests (70%)

Impact on domestic life: moisturizing creams each day (94%); affects clothing & footwear (71%); additional housework (47%); negative impact on familial and conjugal functioning (25%)

Financial burden: care expenses not fully covered (48%); out-of-pocket expenditure (86%) 526€/yr

Impairment in outside activities: workplace discrimination (27%), restriction in leisure & sports (e.g. swimming-pool) (35%)

Moderate
Dreyfus et al. [91] France

158

(including about 20 subjects < 18 yrs)

Cross-sectional—quantitative (low) Questionnaires (VAS; DLQI) N/A Ichthyosis severity Skin-disease-specific QoL

The most affected QoL areas: symptoms & feelings (86%); daily activities (77%); treatments (62%); work (59%); leisure (55%); personal relationships (45%)

QoL↓ ↔ Ichthyosis severity↑*** & ♀*

Moderate
Mazereeuw-Hautier et al. [92] France 25 Exploratory -qualitative (low) Focus groups (n = 5) (TCA) N/A N/A N/A

Physical health: pain & impaired mobility, pruritus, smelly skin

Daily life: activity or work avoidance, daily cream application

Relation to others: dealing w/ other reactions, intimate relations issues, lack of interest from medicine

Personal aspects: fear / stress related to future, negative feelings

High
Kamalpour et al. [96] USA

235

(including about 70 subjects < 18 yrs)

Cross-sectional—quantitative (low) Questionnaires (DLQI; CISI; TimeTx; DermVisits) N/A Biomedical datas; Ichthyosis severity Skin-disease-specific QoL; Resource utilization

Adults QoL↓ vs. children* + ♀ QoL↓ vs. ♂*

QoL↓ ← erythema severity↑**, hyperkeratosis severity↑**, time spent in daily treatment↑**, ichthyosis type**, age↑* (the last one’s really weak…)

TimeTx↑ & DermVisits↑ ← disease severity↑*, age↑* (+ family history → DermVisits*)

Moderate
Gånemo et al. [129] Sweden 122 Cross-sectional—quantitative (moderate) Questionnaires (DLQI; SF-36) 117 non-affected subjects (extracted from another study) Biomedical datas (e.g. ichthyosis features) General & skin-disease-specific QoL

LI patients QoL↓ vs. XLI patients*

Ichthyosis patients QoL↓ on 4 dimensions (…) vs. normative pop.*

High
Gånemo et al. [128] Sweden 10 Cross-sectional mixed—quali-quantitative (low) Semi-structured interviews (TCA) & questionnaires (NHP-I & II) N/A Biomedical datas; Ichtyosis severity Health-related QoL; Health-related problem in daily life

Childhood: parents deeply engaged; feeling different from peers; bullying; shyness; gynophobia; professional orientation; thoughts of how to find a partner

Adulthood: regular doctor appointment (or naturopath, homeopath); improvement of symptoms; time-consuming skin care; skin discomfort (heat intolerance); genetic inheritance concerns

Moderate

All study considered socio-demographic aspects (for example: age; gender; education lvl; socio-economic status; profession; etc.)

IV Independent variable; DV Dependent variable; GTM Grounded theory methodology; TCA Thematic content analysis; XLI X-linked ichthyosis; IV Ichthyosis vulgaris; LI Lamellar ichthyosis; HI Harlequin ichthyosis; MLR Multiple linear regression; ASD Autism spectrum disorders; ADHD Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; pop population

A ↔ B: A is associated with B; A → B: A predicts B; A ← B: A is predicted by B; A↑: A is higher/more important; A↓: A is lower/less important; with: w/; without: w/o; vs.: compared to…

p < 0.05*; p < 0.01**; p < 0.001***