Abstract
Background
Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) are predisposed to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). CD management often includes thiopurines which can promote hepatotoxicity. We aimed to identify the role of NAFLD on the risk of developing liver injury from thiopurines in CD.
Methods
In this prospective cohort analysis, CD patients at a single center were recruited 6/2017–5/2018. Patients with alternative liver diseases were excluded. The primary outcome was time to elevation of liver enzymes. Patients underwent MRI with assessment of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on enrollment, where NAFLD was defined as PDFF >5.5%. Statistical analysis was performed using a Cox-proportional hazards model.
Results
Of the 311 CD patients studied, 116 (37%) were treated with thiopurines, 54 (47%) of which were found to have NAFLD. At follow-up, there were 44 total cases of elevated liver enzymes in those treated with thiopurines. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that NAFLD was a predictor of elevated liver enzymes in patients with CD treated with thiopurines (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2–7.3, P = .018) independent of age, body mass index, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Steatosis severity by PDFF positively correlated with peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at follow-up. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated poorer complication-free survival (log-rank 13.1, P < .001).
Conclusions
NAFLD at baseline is a risk factor for thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in patients with CD. The degree of liver fat positively correlated with the degree of ALT elevation. These data suggest that evaluation for hepatic steatosis be considered in patients with liver enzyme elevations with thiopurine therapy.
Keywords: Crohn’s disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, thiopurine, hepatotoxicity, proton density fat fraction
Introduction
Crohn’s disease (CD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that can exhibit various extraintestinal manifestations. Specifically, patients with CD have been shown to have an increased risk of developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).1–3 Both diseases are increasing in prevalence globally and create greater clinical and economic burden.4,5 Importantly, liver diseases have been suggested to increase mortality in CD.6 While both involve chronic inflammatory processes, the pathophysiologic association between these diseases is not completely understood. Several studies have suggested metabolic dysregulation, CD disease activity, gut dysbiosis, and adverse effects of CD-targeted therapeutic agents as contributing factors to NAFLD development in CD.7,8
Thiopurines, such as 6-mercaptopurine or its precursor azathioprine, are corticosteroid-sparing agents in CD management. However, they are known to trigger several forms of liver injury, including asymptomatic elevation in liver enzymes, hepatocellular necrosis, and/or cholestasis.9 A systematic review of 34 retrospective studies on thiopurine-induced liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found its mean prevalence to be 3% and the mean annual incidence to be 1.4%.9 There exist multiple physiologic pathways for 6-mercaptopurine, including degradation by xanthine oxidase, conversion to 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) by thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT), or conversion to 6-thioguanine by hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT). Genetic polymorphisms resulting in increased TPMT activity increases 6-MMP concentrations and have been implicated in greater hepatotoxicity.10
Preliminary investigations have examined the role of hepatic steatosis determined by ultrasound in patients with IBD on various medications,11,12 however, the performance of abdominal ultrasound for the diagnosis of NAFLD is suboptimal in large part due to its limited sensitivity for depicting mild steatosis.13 Due to these prior limitations, we used proton density fat fraction (PDFF) mapping generated from baseline magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) sequences to better evaluate hepatic steatosis given its improved sensitivity and specificity.14 In this prospective cohort analysis, we aimed to investigate the association between NAFLD and liver enzyme elevation in patients with CD on thiopurine therapy. We hypothesized that NAFLD increased the risk for liver injury in patients with CD being treated with thiopurines.
Materials and Methods
Patient Selection
This study was approved with a waiver of consent by our institutional review board with ID#201705093. Patients with CD undergoing MRE were prospectively and consecutively enrolled at our IBD Center between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018. A chart review was conducted to determine demographics, vital statistics, CD phenotype, outpatient and inpatient records, medication lists, laboratory values, endoscopic reports, and radiographic data. Baseline clinical prediction tool for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (CPN-CD) scoring was calculated (ibdnafld.wustl.edu) as previously described.2 Baseline endoscopy was scored using the simple endoscopic score in Crohn’s disease (SES-CD).15 All data were managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture)16 tools hosted by Washington University in St. Louis.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Patients were included if they were diagnosed with CD by a gastroenterologist at the Washington University IBD Center and had undergone MRE examination with multi-echo sequences to generate PDFF measurements. Patients were excluded if they had a confounding IBD diagnosis (ie indeterminate colitis, ulcerative colitis, microscopic colitis) or another etiology of their liver disease. Specifically, those with greater than moderate alcohol use per AASLD17 and EASL18 guidelines (>3 standard drinks/day in men or >2 standard drinks/day in women), or a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder, chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, or other toxic-metabolic liver diseases (hemochromatosis, α-1 antitrypsin deficiency) were excluded. Patients with severe malnutrition, glucocorticoid use, methotrexate use, and baseline elevated liver enzymes were not excluded so that they could be characterized in the context of this population.
Imaging and PDFF Processing
Imaging was performed on 1.5 or 3.0 T Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) MR machines. Previous studies have reported agreement of PDFF measurements regardless of MR machine manufacturers or magnet strength.19 Patients underwent staging MRE with assessment of PDFF, where a mean PDFF >5.5% indicated NAFLD.20 Severity of disease activity was scored using the magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) score.21
Measurement of Liver Enzymes and Liver Injury
Levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were collected at baseline and follow-up. Those found to have elevated liver enzymes at follow-up were defined to have AST >45 units L−1, ALT >45 units L−1, or ALP >130 units L−1. Patients diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) experienced an ALT >5 times the upper limit of normal and/or an ALP >2 times the upper limit of normal, consistent with updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method criteria.22 Persistent elevations were defined as 2 consecutive elevations in liver enzymes.
Statistical Analysis
The primary outcome included time to elevation in liver enzymes and secondary outcome was time to DILI. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Medians were compared using the independent-samples median test. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to determine complication-free survival which referred to the time until the patient was found to have an elevated liver enzyme at follow-up. Multivariable regression was performed on variables with P < .1 in the univariate analysis or if biologically relevant. This was completed using a Cox-proportional hazards model and backward stepwise selection method with Bayesian information criterion (BIC) selection criteria. A 2-sided P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistics were calculated using SPSS v28 (IBM Corp).
Ethical Considerations
Study was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Institutional Review Board # 201705093 initially on 5/162017 and reapproved on 3/20/22 through 3/19/23.
Results
Baseline Characteristics
A total of 311 patients with CD were enrolled after the exclusion of 22 patients (Figure 1) as previously published.1,2 The subset of the cohort analyzed here consisted of 116 patients who were initiating or maintained on a thiopurine, 54 (47%) of which had NAFLD. Baseline characteristics showed that those diagnosed with NAFLD were older with higher median body mass index (BMI) and a greater percentage with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (Table 1). Median follow-up time was 2.5 years.
Figure 1.
Patient selection. Abbreviations: MRE, magnetic resonance enterography; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics.
| Thiopurine use without NAFLD (n = 62) | Thiopurine use with NAFLD (n = 54) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 36 (29–45) | 48 (38–58) | .002 | |
| Female sex, n (%) | 32 (52) | 31 (57) | .532 | |
| Black or African American race, n (%) | 8 (13) | 2 (4) | .078 | |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 13 (21) | 11 (20) | .937 | |
| BMI, median (IQR) | 24 (21–28) | 31 (25–34) | <.001 | |
| CD duration, years, median (IQR) | 12 (5–19) | 17 (5–25) | .352 | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 7 (11) | 15 (28) | .024 | |
| Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 0 (0) | 6 (11) | .007 | |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 4 (6) | 8 (15) | .140 | |
| History of TPN, n (%) | 1 (2) | 2 (4) | .475 | |
| Baseline AST >45 units L−1, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | — | |
| Baseline ALT >45 units L−1, n (%) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | .947 | |
| Baseline ALP >130 units L−1, n (%) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | .173 | |
| SES-CD, median (IQR) | 6.5 (1.5–9.0) | 0 (0–2) | .164 | |
| MaRIA, median (IQR) | 13 (4–23.5) | 0 (0–2.5) | .002 | |
| Prior biologic use, n (%) | 54 (87) | 44 (81) | .405 | |
| Baseline methotrexate use, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | .282 | |
| Baseline glucocorticoid use, n (%) | 6 (10) | 3 (6) | .408 | |
| Biologic use, n (%) | Anti-TNF | 35 (56) | 30 (56) | .923 |
| Anti-integrin | 4 (6) | 7 (13) | .232 | |
| Anti-IL-12/23 | 9 (15) | 4 (7) | .226 | |
| Montreal location, n (%) | Ileum (L1) | 7 (11) | 7 (13) | .783 |
| Colon (L2) | 5 (8) | 4 (7) | .895 | |
| Ileocolonic (L3) | 50 (81) | 43 (80) | .891 | |
| Upper GI, n (%) | 2 (3) | 3 (6) | .538 | |
| Montreal age, n (%) | <17 years (A1) | 9 (15) | 4 (7) | .217 |
| 17–40 years (A2) | 41 (66) | 39 (72) | .496 | |
| ≥40 years (A3) | 8 (13) | 8 (15) | .780 | |
| Montreal phenotype, n (%) | Inflammatory (B1) | 6 (10) | 7 (13) | .576 |
| Stricturing (B2) | 6 (10) | 4 (7) | .664 | |
| Penetrating (B3) | 50 (81) | 43 (80) | .891 | |
| Perianal disease, n (%) | 23 (37) | 12 (22) | .082 | |
| Surgical history, n (%) | No bowel surgery | 31 (50) | 13 (24) | .070 |
| Ileocecal resection | 42 (68) | 26 (48) | .033 | |
| Small bowel resection | 6 (10) | 5 (9) | .939 | |
| Subtotal colectomy | 5 (8) | 4 (7) | .895 | |
| Total colectomy | 2 (3) | 3 (6) | .538 | |
| Bowel continuity, n (%) | Normal | 2 (3) | 3 (6) | .820 |
| Ileocolonic anastomosis | 19 (31) | 25 (46) | .655 | |
| Ileoanal pouch | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | .363 | |
| Ileostomy | 3 (5) | 3 (6) | .788 | |
| Colostomy | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | .110 | |
Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CD, Crohn’s disease; GI, gastrointestinal; IQR, interquartile range; MaRIA, magnetic resonance index of activity; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score in Crohn’s disease; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TPN, total parenteral nutrition.
NAFLD and Thiopurine-Related Liver Injury
Follow-up revealed 44 patients with elevated liver enzymes, including 2 patients meeting criteria for DILI. Specifically, one of the patients with DILI had an ALP greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal with NAFLD, while the other had an AST greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal without NAFLD. Patients on thiopurines with NAFLD were significantly more likely to experience elevated liver enzymes at follow-up compared with those without (Figure 2A, P = .002). Persistent elevations were also more frequent in the NAFLD group (Figure 2B, P < .001). While the differences remained suggestive at ALT elevations greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal (Figure 2C, P = .051), median peak ALT at follow-up was overall significantly greater in patients with NAFLD (Figure 2D, 43 vs 28 units L−1, P < .001). Of the 44 patients who experienced elevations in liver enzymes at follow-up, there were 24 persistent cases, 6 of which resolved after decreasing the dose or stopping thiopurine therapy while the remaining with persistent elevation were monitored on the same dose of thiopurines. In addition, the severity of hepatic steatosis as represented by mean baseline PDFF had a direct relationship with peak ALT levels at follow-up (Figure 3A) and baseline CPN-CD scores (Figure 3B) as determined by linear regression. Of the 44 patients who experienced elevated liver enzymes at follow-up, there was no significant difference between baseline dose of azathioprine (Figure 4A, P = .711) and 6-MMP levels (Figure 4B, P = .486) among those on thiopurines regardless of the presence or absence of NAFLD. Additionally, the 44 patients with liver enzyme elevation in comparison to those without elevation (n = 72), did not demonstrate a greater odds of hospitalization, surgery or a CD flare requiring corticosteroids.
Figure 2.
NAFLD and liver injury in patients taking thiopurines. NAFLD was significantly associated with elevated liver enzymes at follow-up in patients taking thiopurines (A, P = .002), and this remained true for those with persistent elevations (B, P < .001). This trend remained suggestive at greater magnitudes of ALT elevation (C, P = .051). The peak ALT level at follow-up was significantly greater in the NAFLD group than those without NAFLD (D, 43 vs 28 units L−1, P < .001). * indicates P < .05. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ULN, upper limit of normal.
Figure 3.
Peak ALT at follow-up or baseline CPN-CD as a function of baseline severity of hepatic steatosis in patients with Crohn’s disease. There was a direct association between peak ALT at follow-up (A) or baseline CPN-CD score (B) with baseline severity of hepatic steatosis. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CPN-CD, clinical prediction tool for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Crohn’s disease; PDFF, proton density fat fraction.
Figure 4.
Baseline azathioprine dose and peak 6-methylmercaptopurine levels in patients with elevated liver enzymes at follow-up. Patients with elevated liver enzymes at follow-up were found to have similar baseline doses of azathioprine (A, P = .711) and peak 6-methylmercaptopurine (B, P = .486) levels. Mean denoted as “X.” Abbreviation: NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Regression Analysis
Univariate analysis found NAFLD to be a risk factor for elevated liver enzymes at follow-up (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6–5.5, P < .001). This persisted in the multivariable analysis which revealed NAFLD as an independent predictor of any elevation in liver enzymes from thiopurine therapy in patients with CD (Table 2, HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2–7.3, P = .018) and not baseline age ≥40, BMI ≥30, hypertension, or type 2 diabetes. Patients treated with thiopurines for CD experienced poorer complication-free survival related to the incidence of elevated liver enzymes if they had concomitant NAFLD (Figure 5, P < .001), and this persisted the entire duration of the study.
Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate analysis on the risk of liver injury due to thiopurine therapy in patients with CD.
| Univariate, HR (95% CI) | P | Multivariate, HR (95% CI) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 1.3 (0.7–2.3) | .461 | ||
| Baseline age ≥40 | 1.2 (0.7–2.2) | .486 | 0.9 (0.4–2.2) | .863 |
| Black or African American race | 0.7 (0.2–2.2) | .506 | ||
| Smoker | 1.3 (0.7–2.7) | .429 | ||
| BMI ≥30 | 1.8 (1.0–3.2) | .060 | 1.6 (0.7–4.0) | .279 |
| Hypertension | 1.3 (0.6–2.8) | .423 | 1.1 (0.3–3.4) | .918 |
| Type 2 diabetes | 1.3 (0.4–4.3) | .628 | 0.7 (0.1–4.5) | .699 |
| Perianal disease | 0.6 (0.3–1.2) | .129 | ||
| History of ileocolonic resection | 1.5 (0.9–2.8) | .155 | ||
| History of total colectomy | 1.6 (0.5–5.3) | .416 | ||
| NAFLD | 3.0 (1.6–5.5) | <.001 | 3.0 (1.2–7.3) | .018 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CD, Crohn’s disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 5.
Complication-free survival on thiopurine therapy in patients with CD as a function of NAFLD (P < .001). Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate the influence of NAFLD on liver injury in patients with CD taking thiopurines. Specifically, patients with CD and NAFLD were about 3 times as likely to be found with elevated liver enzymes at follow-up independent of BMI. Linear regression also demonstrated a direct association between fat content and peak ALT concentration at follow-up.
Two prior studies have suggested an association between steatosis and elevated liver tests in patients with CD taking immunomodulators. In a retrospective study of 259 patients with IBD (170 [66%] with CD and 73 [28%] with steatosis), a greater percentage of those with IBD and steatosis compared with those without steatosis were found to have elevated liver enzymes at follow-up (44% vs 24%, P = .0095).12 However, this study diagnosed steatosis by ultrasound which has been shown to not always correlate with histological findings,13,20 and the risk of liver injury specifically in patients with CD taking thiopurines was not investigated. In a second study of 121 IBD patients where 39 (32.2%) had steatosis determined by ultrasound, there was a greater mean change in ALT in the NAFLD group versus those without NAFLD (+23.5 vs −4.75 U L−1) in patients with an elevated 6-MMP level, though this was limited to 8 patients.11 This study concluded that there was a positive association between 6-MMP levels and change in ALT in patients with fatty liver (P < .001) but not in those with a normal liver as determined by ultrasound imaging. In addition, in these 8 patients, patients with steatosis were associated with high 6-MMP levels despite being on lower doses of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight.
Our study is the first and largest to investigate the role of NAFLD diagnosed by a more reliable method specifically in patients with CD on thiopurines. The use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to calculate mean PDFF allowed for a quantified and more reliable assessment of hepatic steatosis that has been shown to correlate well with liver biopsy results unlike other radiological modalities such as CT or ultrasound which are more subjective and generally less sensitive for small amounts of fat.1,20 Therefore, our cohort had a more reliable diagnosis of NAFLD. In addition, we show a quantifiable association between peak ALT and increasing PDFF. Our study also collected metabolite levels on 27 subjects, a greater amount than has been reported in previous studies. We also demonstrate that patients with elevated liver enzymes at follow-up had no significant difference in the baseline dose of azathioprine and 6-MMP levels, suggesting that the mechanism for elevated ALT was independent of 6-MMP levels, contrary to what has previously been reported.
The coexistence of CD and NAFLD is being increasingly recognized.1–3 A recent meta-analysis of 44 studies demonstrated that up to 38% of patients with IBD have NAFLD, and there was nearly double the risk of NAFLD in IBD patients compared with healthy controls (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13–3.41).23 The etiology of this association is likely multifactorial, including increased intestinal permeability, disruption of the gut microbiome, exposure to hepatotoxic medications, and nutritional deficiencies.3 The increased incidence of liver injury identified in our study in patients with CD and NAFLD treated with thiopurines may be consistent with a multi-hit hypothesis where the addition of this medication amplifies hepatic insult. The metabolite levels were found to be similar between patients with and without NAFLD. This may be because the mechanism of thiopurine-induced liver injury in this population is independent of detected levels of 6-MMP. Alternatively, this may be because only 27 of 44 patients had this value recorded. Patients with NAFLD often have concomitant obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and/or cardiovascular comorbidities. Notably, our data also suggest the influence of NAFLD on elevated liver enzymes was independent of that of obesity. NAFLD has been reported to increase drug cytotoxicity as its altered metabolic environment promotes increased baseline reactive oxygen species24–26 which results in liver injury. Alternative management strategies to consider include decreasing thiopurine dosing, using methotrexate to attenuate anti-TNF immunogenicity,27 or using less immunogenic biologics such as vedolizumab (4.1% incidence)28 or ustekinumab (2.3% incidence).29 Baseline transient or MR elastography can be considered in patients with CD and NAFLD treated with thiopurines as is recommended in certain scenarios of patients with psoriasis treated with methotrexate.30
Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. This study was completed at a single tertiary care center which may limit generalizability. The presence of NAFLD itself may increase transaminases and may confound the results irrespective of thiopurine use. The definition of liver injury included any elevation of liver enzymes above the upper limit of normal, and the clinical significance of mild asymptomatic elevations in liver enzymes, especially those that are transient, is unclear. Clinical endpoints such as hospitalizations, glucocorticoid use, and mortality were not investigated. Further evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes in larger, prospective studies is warranted.
Conclusion
The presence of NAFLD in patients with CD treated with thiopurines is significantly associated with elevation in liver enzymes compared with those without NAFLD, and complication-free survival in those with NAFLD on thiopurines was significantly worse. While patients with CD on thiopurine therapy undergo routine monitoring of their liver enzymes, screening for NAFLD among those with elevation in liver enzymes, especially among those with a normal 6-MMP level, is recommended.
Contributor Information
Alvin T George, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew Glover, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Quazim Alayo, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Maria Zulfiqar, Department of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Daniel R Ludwig, Department of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew A Ciorba, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Scott McHenry, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Parakkal Deepak, Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Funding
Dr. Deepak is supported by a Junior Faculty Development Award from the American College of Gastroenterology and IBD Plexus of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Dr. Ciorba is supported by R01DK109384, Lawrence C. Pakula MD IBD Education and Innovation Fund and Pfizer (IIS #61798927).
Authors’ Contributions
M.G., S.M., M.A.C., and P.D. conceived idea. A.T.G., M.G., M.Z., D.R.L., and S.M. assisted with data collection. A.T.G. and P.D. performed data analysis and interpretation, drafted manuscript. All authors discussed the results and reviewed and revised the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
A.T.G., M.G., Q.A., M.Z., D.R.L., and S.M.: nothing to disclose. M.A.C. participated in consulting, advisory board, or speaker’s bureau for AbbVie, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Theravance, and received funding under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the paper from Incyte, Pfizer, Janssen, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. P.D. holds the position of Associate Editor for Crohn’s & Colitis 360 and has been recused from reviewing or making decisions for the manuscript. Research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the paper and/or consulting from AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Scipher Medicine, and CorEvitas, LLC. Writing assistance: none.
Data Availability
Data available on reasonable request.
References
- 1. McHenry S, Sharma Y, Tirath A, et al. Crohn’s disease is associated with an increased prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study using magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction mapping. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(13):2816–2818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. McHenry S, Tirath A, Tsai R, et al. Derivation and internal validation of a clinical prediction tool to predict nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26(12):1917–1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chao CY, Battat R, Al Khoury A, Restellini S, Sebastiani G, Bessissow T.. Co-existence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and inflammatory bowel disease: a review article. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(34):7727–7734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Younossi ZM, Blissett D, Blissett R, et al. The economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and Europe. Hepatology. 2016;64(5):1577–1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ananthakrishnan AN. Epidemiology and risk factors for IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(4):205–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Riegler G, D’Incà R, Sturniolo GC, et al. Hepatobiliary alterations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter study. Caprilli & Gruppo Italiano Studio Colon-Retto. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(1):93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zou ZY, Shen B, Fan JG.. Systematic review with meta-analysis: epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(11):1764–1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hyun CK. Molecular and pathophysiological links between metabolic disorders and inflammatory bowel diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9139-9139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gisbert JP, González-Lama Y, Maté J.. Thiopurine-induced liver injury in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(7):1518–1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Khokhar OS, Lewis JH.. Hepatotoxicity of agents used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):508–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Phillips J, Preskey R, Penfold C, Gordon F, Tyrrell-Price J.. Liver steatosis is a risk factor for hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with azathioprine. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32(10):1390–1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Schröder T, Schmidt KJ, Olsen V, et al. Liver steatosis is a risk factor for hepatotoxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(6):698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ryan CK, Johnson LA, Germin BI, Marcos A.. One hundred consecutive hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(12):1114–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013;267(2):422–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Daperno M, D’Haens G, Van Assche G, et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn’s disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(4):505–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG.. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Deepak P, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, et al. Radiological response is associated with better long-term outcomes and is a potential treatment target in patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(7):997–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT.. Proton density fat fraction measurements at 1.5- and 3-T hepatic MR imaging: same-day agreement among readers and across two imager manufacturers. Radiology. 2017;284(1):244–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;288(2):E462–E468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, García-Bosch O, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009;58(8):1113–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sandhu N, Navarro V.. Drug-induced liver injury in GI practice. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(5):631–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zamani M, Alizadeh-Tabari S, Singh S, Loomba R.. Meta-analysis: prevalence of, and risk factors for, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022;55(8):894–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Begriche K, Massart J, Robin MA, Bonnet F, Fromenty B.. Mitochondrial adaptations and dysfunctions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1497–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Koliaki C, Roden M.. Hepatic energy metabolism in human diabetes mellitus, obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;379(1–2):35–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Massart J, Begriche K, Moreau C, Fromenty B.. Role of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as risk factor for drug-induced hepatotoxicity. J Clin Transl Res. 2017;3(Suppl 1):212–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Vermeire S, Gils A, Accossato P, Lula S, Marren A.. Immunogenicity of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11(1):1756283X17750355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, et al. ; GEMINI 2 Study Group. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):711–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, et al. ; UNITI–IM-UNITI Study Group. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1946–1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Menter A, Gelfand JM, Connor C, et al. Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic nonbiologic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):1445–1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on reasonable request.





