Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;35(4):394–401. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002497

Table 3.

Diagnostic performances of different steatosis indices

Index systems AUROC SEN SPE PPV NPV Cut-off value
Diagnostic ability for MAFLD
FLI 0.840 (0.822–0.858) 0.783 0.732 0.574 0.880 56.93
FSI 0.833 (0.815–0.852) 0.793 0.710 0.558 0.881 21.12
ZJU 0.826 (0.808–0.845) 0.859 0.665 0.542 0.911 39.16
LAP 0.826 (0.807–0.844) 0.827 0.694 0.555 0.897 36.74
HSI 0.814 (0.795–0.834) 0.810 0.691 0.547 0.887 37.85
VAI 0.747 (0.723–0.770) 0.666 0.731 0.533 0.826 1.47
Diagnostic ability for NAFLD
FLI 0.812 (0.792–0.832) 0.727 0.724 0.515 0.868 60.00
FSI 0.811 (0.791–0.832) 0.753 0.708 0.509 0.877 23.00
ZJU 0.811 (0.791–0.831) 0.892 0.583 0.462 0.930 38.00
LAP 0.799 (0.778–0.820) 0.787 0.678 0.495 0.888 38.00
HSI 0.803 (0.782–0.823) 0.877 0.571 0.451 0.920 36.00
VAI 0.729 (0.705–0.754) 0.533 0.787 0.501 0.807 1.78

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic; FLI, fatty liver index; FSI, Framingham Steatosis Index; HSI, hepatitis steatosis index; LAP, lipid accumulation product; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; VAI, visceral adiposity index; ZJU, Zhejiang University index.