Table 1.
Application | Pretreatment Methods | Pros | Cons | Refs. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture sector Biofuels and manure Enzymatic digestibility Ethanol production Bio-oil and biochar formation Food sector Bioactive compounds Nutraceuticals Ethanol and enzyme production |
Physical | Grinding | From biomass, a fine powder with a crystallinity of up to 0.2 mm is produced. | Lack of long-term viability in technique calls for a lot of energy. | [27,28,29,30,31,32] |
Ultrasonic | Easing the process of breaking down a variety of lignocellulosic materials. | Collisions between particles during prolonged sonication could result in an antagonistic effect. | |||
Steaming explosion | Minimal need for energy. | Incomplete lignin-carbohydrate matrix cleavage, xylan fraction destruction, creation of hydrolysis, and fermentation inhibitors. | |||
Microwave | Easily functional, and with efficiency in handling large agro-waste with fewer inhibitors being formed. | This causes both a rise in temperature and an increase in the amount of electricity used. | |||
Pyrolysis | The highest possible rate of cellulose sugar conversion. | High-cost technique. | |||
Irradiations | The surface area was increased, crystallinity was reduced, hemicelluloses were hydrolyzed, and the structure of lignin was altered. | Expensive method. | |||
Pharma sectorSugars (glucose, xylose, mannose, and galactose) and organic acids (formic, acetic acid) production Agriculture sector Enzymes production, organic acids, and hydrolysis of agro-waste to increase glucose yield Biorefinery Biomass saccharification, bioethanol and biogas production Food sector Extraction of phenolic compounds and acids productions |
Chemical | Acid hydrolysis (HCl, CH3COOH, H2SO4) | Change the structure of lignin, and hydrolyze hemicellulose to xylose and other sugars. | Corrosion of expensive equipment and the production of harmful byproducts are additional costs. | [2,29,33,34,35] |
Alkaline hydrolysis (KOH, NaOH, NH4OH, Mg(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 | Pretreatment under milder conditions. Removing lignin and hemicelluloses raises the available surface area. | High alkalinity concentrations and lengthy residence durations are necessary. | |||
Ozonolysis | Decreases lignin content. Does not indicate the production of hazardous substances. | Method that is both expensive and demanding of a substantial quantity of ozone. | |||
Organosolv | Hydrolyzes lignin and hemicellulose; helpful for lignin extraction. | Due to their high volatility, costly solvents are unsuitable for industrial use. | |||
Wet oxidation | Effectively eliminated lignin and low formation inhibitors. | Expensive because of the utilization of oxygen and acid catalyst. | |||
Agriculture sector Animal manure and biofertilizers Biorefinery and animal feed Pharma sector Antibiotics production Food sector Single cell protein |
Biological | Enzyme | Moderate circumstances are present, and minimal effort is necessary. | Low hydrolysis rate and a large sterile space requirement. | [13,23,36,37] |
Bacteria | Economical and requiring only mild reaction conditions. | ||||
Fungi | Inexpensive, destroys lignin and hemicelluloses, minimal energy needs. | ||||
Food and pharma sectors Antibiotic production Antioxidant properties Antibacterial and anticancer properties |
Green solvents | Ionic liquids | Effective at dissolving copious amounts of cellulose and recovering usable cellulose from lignin. | Possible toxicity, prohibitively expensive method, and a lack of practicality for mass production. | [38,39,40] |
Deep eutectic solvents | Conditions are modest but environmentally friendly and safe. | Creates undesirable contaminants and higher viscosity on occasion. | |||
Natural deep eutectic solvents | Low-cost, readily available, highly modifiable, and less hazardous. |