Table 4.

Regression models for factors related to dyadic adjustment.

Patients with Bipolar Disorder	Beta [95% CI]	Adj. Beta [95% CI]	p-Value
TAS	−0.68 [−1.12; −0.24]	−0.30 [−0.50; −0.11]	0.003
GRISS	−4.32 [−6.65; −1.99]	−0.36 [−0.56; −0.17]	p < 0.001
Female	−7.72 [−20.39; 4.94]	−0.14 [−0.36; 0.09]	0.23
Unemployed	5.48 [−7.57; 18.53]	0.10 [−0.14; 0.33]	0.41
HDRS	−2.74 [−4.66; −0.83]	−0.27 [−0.46; −0.08]	0.01
R = 0.64 R-Square = 0.41 Adj. R-Square = 0.37
Spouses	Beta [95% CI]	Adj. Beta [95% CI]	p-Value
TAS	−0.50 [−0.97; −0.02]	−0.22 [−0.42; −0.01]	0.04
GRISS	−1.64 [−4.48; 1.20]	−0.13 [−0.35; 0.09]	0.25
Female	−3.96 [−15.51; 7.59]	−0.07 [−0.27; 0.13]	0.50
Unemployed	10.86 [−0.70; 22.42]	0.20 [−0.01; 0.40]	0.07
HDRS	−1.48 [−4.99; 2.03]	−0.09 [−0.30; 0.12]	0.40
BAS	−0.80 [−1.36; −0.24]	−0.33 [−0.56; −0.10]	0.01
R = 0.55 R-Square = 0.31 Adj. R-Square = 0.25

Dependent variable: dyadic adjustment, CI: confidence interval, Adj. Adjusted, HDRS: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, GRISS: Golombok–Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction, TAS: Toronto Alexithymia Scale, BAS: Burden Assessment Scale.