Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 28;12(2):200. doi: 10.3390/biology12020200

Table 3.

Mean recovery rates after cryopreservation (%) by using PVS2 vitrification of shoot tips is dependent on the Pyrus species. In the first two years, controls without cryopreservation were additionally analyzed for some accessions.

Section Subsection Species No Acc. No of Ex-Plants Recovery (%)
Cryo SD Control without Cryo
Pyrus P. pyraster PYR0312 20 70.00
P. pyraster PYR0303 20 60.00
P. pyraster PYR0308 80 43.75 20.12
P. pyraster PYR0308 10 40.00
P. communis PYR0116 80 11.25 14.31
P. communis PYR0116 20 15.00
P. balansae PYR0020 40 0.00
Pashia Koehne Armoricana (Decne.) Terpó P. cordata PYR0014 80 48.75 19.49
P. cordata PYR0014 10 70.00
P. cossonii PYR0023 100 0.20 0.40
P. cossonii PYR0023 10 10.00
Mongolica (Decne.) Terpó P. ovoidea PYR0032 20 5.00
Pashia (Koehne) Terpó P. betulaefolia PYR0040 80 28.75 14.31
P. betulaefolia PYR0040 20 40.00
P. calleriana PYR0115 80 30.00 23.72
P. calleriana PYR0115 10 30.00
Pontica Decne. Emend. Terpó P. ×nivalis PYR0073 20 10.00
P. elaeagrifolia PYR0017 20 15.00
Pyrifolia Tuz P. ×bretschneideri PYR0041 100 47.00 16.31
P. ×bretschneideri PYR0041 20 95.00
Xeropyrenia (Fed.) Tuz P. korshinskyi PYR0202 80 88.75 8.20
P. korshinskyi PYR0202 10 30.00
Average 32.67 40.78