Table 2.
Biomarkers | Patients | Prognostic Significance | Year | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-treatment ALB/ALP ratio a | 217 patients with HCC treated with curative surgical resection (as training cohort); 256 patients with HCC treated with curative surgical resection; and 425 patients with HCC treated with transarterial therapy, systemic chemotherapy, or supportive care (as 2 validation cohorts). | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS and DFS (<0.23 vs. ≥0.23). | 2015 | Chan et al. [33] |
221 HBV-infected patients with HCC treated with curative surgical resection. | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS and RFS (≤0.40 vs. >0.40). | 2020 | Li et al. [34] | |
267 patients with combined HCC and cholangiocarcinoma treated with curative surgical resection (187 as training cohort and 80 as validation cohort). | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS (≤0.43 vs. >0.43). | 2020 | Zhang et al. [35] | |
210 patients with HCC treated with liver transplantation. | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS (≤0.38 vs. >0.38). | 2020 | Li et al. [36] | |
445 patients with HCC treated with RFA (297 as training cohort and 148 as validation cohort). | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS and RFS (≤0.40 vs. >0.40). | 2021 | Zhang et al. [37] | |
372 patients with HCC treated with TACE (as training cohort); 82 patients with HCC treated with TACE; and 202 patients with HCC treated with supportive care (as 2 validation cohorts). | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS (≤0.439 vs. >0.439). | 2018 | Chen et al. [38] | |
237 patients with advanced HCC treated without any standard anti-cancer therapies. | Low ALB/ALP ratio predicted worse OS (≤0.38 vs. >0.38). | 2018 | Cai et al. [39] |
a ALB/ALP ratio was calculated by dividing serum ALB level (g/L) by serum ALP level (IU/L). Abbreviations: ALB—albumin; ALP—alkaline phosphatase; HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma; OS—overall survival; DFS—disease-free survival; TACE—transarterial chemoembolization; HBV—hepatitis B virus; RFS—recurrence-free survival; RFA—radiofrequency ablation; vs.—versus.