Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 8;13(2):284. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020284

Table 2.

Characteristics of analyzed patients according to ARAT severity classification.

Characteristics Recovery Capacity on the ARAT
No Poor Limited Notable Full
Patients (n) 275 (30) 167 (18) 269 (30) 84 (9) 112 (12)
Age (years) 63 (53, 70) 66 (54, 71) 61 (52, 69) 64 (55, 70) 63 (54, 69)
Sex Female 109 (40) 58 (35) 75 (28) 29 (35) 26 (23)
Male 166 (60) 109 (65) 194 (72) 55 (65) 86 (77)
Paralyzed hand Left 129 (47) 74 (44) 108 (40) 39 (46) 45 (40)
Right 146 (53) 93 (56) 161 (60) 45 (54) 67 (60)
Dominant hand Left 19 (7) 3 (2) 9 (3) 5 (6) 5 (6)
Right 256 (93) 163 (98) 259 (96) 79 (94) 79 (94)
Bilateral 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Laterality in the paretic and dominant hand Ipsilateral side 136 (49) 76 (46) 112 (42) 40 (48) 47 (42)
Contralateral side 139 (51) 91 (54) 157 (58) 44 (52) 65 (58)
Diagnosis CI 145 (53) 89 (53) 138 (51) 47 (56) 46 (41)
ICH 130 (47) 78 (47) 131 (49) 37 (44) 66 (59)
Time from onset (months) 45 (27, 70) 40 (24, 63) 34 (19, 66) 37 (21, 78) 39 (18, 63)
rTMS stimulation method Low frequency 222 (81) 124 (74) 206 (77) 67 (80) 89 (79)
High frequency 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Theta burst 52 (19) 43 (26) 63 (23) 17 (20) 23 (20)
Treatment by botulinum toxin A or xylocaine Treatment 2 (0.7) 1 (0.6) 2 (0.7) 1 (1) 1 (1)
No treatment 273 (99) 166 (99) 267 (99) 83 (99) 111 (99)
Pre-treatment ARAT score Total 4 (3, 6) 16 (13, 18) 30 (26, 36) 48 (45, 51) 57 (56, 57)
Pre-treatment JASMID score Quantity 20 (19, 26) 28 (20, 38) 41 (28, 58) 60 (40, 77) 73 (59, 91)
Quality 20 (20, 25) 26 (20, 35) 25 (37, 51) 48 (36, 63) 63 (48, 78)

Values are presented as n (%) or median (25th, 75th percentile). ARAT, Action Research Arm Test; CI, cerebral infarction; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; JASMID, Jikei Assessment Scale for Motor Impairment in Daily Living. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was set at 1 Hz for low-frequency stimulation, 10 Hz for high-frequency stimulation, and theta-burst as an alternative method. Pre-treatment ARAT scores of 0–10 indicate no upper limb capacity, scores of 11–21 represent poor capacity, scores of 22–42 represent limited capacity, scores of 43–54 represent notable capacity, and scores of 55–67 represent full upper limb capacity. Total patients, n = 907.