Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;15(4):1285. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041285

Table 2.

Studies on the ability of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CEUS-E) to detect Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs).

Author Study N. GISTs Lesion Size mm Echo Pattern Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV AUROC Conclusion
Sakamoto et al., 2011 [49] Prospective 29 (n = 29 pts) >30 mm (18/29, 62%) Type I (regular vessels, homogeneous enhancement): Low-grade malignancy (n = 8);
Type II (irregular vessels, heterogeneous enhancement): High-grade malignancy (n = 16), low-grade malignancy (n = 5)
100% (malignancy prediction based on irregular vessels) 63% (malignancy prediction based on irregular vessels) NA NA 83% (malignancy prediction based on irregular vessels) CH-EUS successfully visualized intratumoral vessels and may be useful in predicting GIST malignancy risk
Yamashita Y et al., 2015 [52] Prospective 13 (n = 13 pts) 1.9–60 Hyperenhancement (n = 13/13); vessel positive (n = 6): very low/ low-grade malignancy, 1 (17%); Intermediate/high-grade malignancy, 5 (83%)—vessel negative (n = 7): very low / low-grade malignancy, 7 (100%) NA The specificity of rich vascularity determined via CE-EUS for intermediate or high-risk GIST was high NA NA NA Intratumoral vessels identified using CE-EUS in GISTs are associated with a higher degree of angiogenesis, implying a higher malignant potential
Park HY et al., 2016 [55] Retrospective 35 32.5 ± 12.5 Irregular vessels: high-grade malignancy (63.6%), low-grade malignancy (46.7%); Heterogeneous perfusion: high-grade malignancy (36.4%), low-grade malignancy (26.7%); Non-enhancing spots: high-grade malignancy (63.6%), low-grade malignancy (46.7%) 53.8% 66.7% [N. positive findings > 1 (benign vs. GIST)] 86.4% [N. positive findings > 1 (benign vs. GIST)] 46.2% [N. positive findings > 1 (benign vs. GIST)] 71.4% [N. positive findings > 1 (benign vs. GIST)]; 63.6% (malignancy prediction) CH-EUS had low sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in predicting SEL malignancy risk
Ignee A et al., 2017 [50] Prospective 57 (SELs, n = 62) 62.6 ± 42.1 (16–200) Hyperenhancement: 56/57 (98%); avascular areas: 50/57 patients (88%) 98% 100% 100% 93% 98% CH-EUS reveals hyperenhancement and avascular areas in a high percentage of GISTs but not in leiomyoma. GISTs and leiomyoma can thus be distinguished precisely
Kannengiesser K et al., 2017 [51] Prospective 8 (n = 17 pts) NA Hyperenhancement (maximum intensity, 47.3 ± 11.6 db) (n = 8/8) NA NA NA NA NA CH-EUS can accurately distinguish GISTs from benign lesions
Kamata K et al., 2017 [54] Retrospective 58 (n = 73 pts) 28 (10–90) Hyperenhancement: 49/58 (84.5%); inhomogeneous: 21/58 (36.2%) 84.5% 73.3% NA NA 82.2% GISTs were discovered to have hyper-enhancement and inhomogeneous enhancement
Pesenti C et al., 2019 [46] Retrospective 5 (SELs, n = 14) 35 Hyperenhancement: 5/5 (100%) 100% NA NA NA NA CH-EUS could be used in conjunction with EUS to differentiate GISTs from other SELs (early and clear enhancement)
Cho IR et al., 2019 [56] Retrospective 37 (n = 176 pts) 2.61 ± 1.71 Hyperenhancement: 51.4%; positive vascularity: 81.1%; lower LSR: 1.3 81.1% (vascularity) 84.8% (vascularity) 85.8% (vascularity) 80% (vascularity) 82.9% (vascularity) Upon conducting CH-EUS, the LSR and vascularity of SELs can be used as parameters for a noninvasive GIST prediction model
Tang JY et al., 2019 [44] Meta-analysis n = 187 pts 25–63 Hyperenhancement: 100% 89% (95%CI 0.82–0.93) 82% (95%CI 0.66–0.92) NA NA 0.89 CH-EUS is a noninvasive, safe method for differentiating GIST from benign SELs and, to a lesser extent, predicting their malignant potential
Lee HS et al., 2019 [57] Retrospective 32 (n = 44 pts) Low-grade malignancy: 27 (16–50); High-grade malignancy: 34 (15–65) Low-grade malignancy: irregular vessels 11 (55.0), heterogeneous perfusion 12 (60.0), hyperechoic foci 10 (50.0), non-enhancing spots 11 (55.0);
High-grade malignancy: irregular vessels 8 (66.7), heterogeneous perfusion 5 (6.2), hyperechoic foci 8 (66.7), non-enhancing spots 8 (66.7)
84.4% (perfusion) 60% (perfusion) 93.1% (perfusion) 37.5% (perfusion) NA The combination of CH-EUS and perfusion analysis performed with perfusion analysis software may be a quantitative and independent method for predicting malignancy risk in gastrointestinal SELs
Lefort C et al., 2021 [58] Retrospective 40 (n = 54 pts) 40 (15–150) Hyperenhancement (NA) Diagnostic (GIST): 85%; malignancy GISTs 100% Diagnostic (GIST): 57.1%; malignancy prediction: 82.1% NA NA Diagnostic (GIST): 77.8%; malignancy prediction: 86.1% CH-EUS outperformed B-mode EUS with respect to differentiating leiomyomas and risk stratifying GIST. The addition of CH-EUS improved diagnostic accuracy in high-grade GISTs

Abbreviations: GISTs: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; SELs: Subepithelial lesions; GI: gastrointestinal; LSR: long-to-short axis ratio.