Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 5;13(4):588. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040588

Table 3.

Comparison of EDV in the CRA and PSV in the NSPCAs in POAG vs. NTG patients.

EDV CRA PSV NSPCA
Reference POAG/NTG POAG NTG POAG NTG
[36] 214/192 2.66 ± 0.9 ** 2.71 ± 0.98 ** 9.39 ± 3.1 9.35 ± 3.3
[42] 17/28 2.4 (0.4) 2.9 (0.9) 10.3 (2.0) 10.1 (3.5)
[43] 74/63 2.63 ± 0.8 * 2.88 ± 0.9 * 9.17 ± 2.8 9.52 ± 3.0
[44] 86/69 2.70 (0.9) 2.96 (1.1) 9.51 (2.9) 9.51 (2.8)
[46] 88/58 2.72 ± 0.8 2.92 ± 1.0 9.68 ± 2.9 9.22 ± 2.7
[47] 102/89 2.75 ± 0.95 2.87 ± 1.08 9.44 ± 2.70 * 8.58 ± 2.69 *
[53] 49/62 2.7 (0.98) 2.8 (0.98) 8.9 (2.3) * 8.2 (2.6) *

[Mean Values (and Standard Deviation/SD) are depicted] * a statistically significant difference between POAG and NTG. ** statistically significant difference only in the multivariate models [12]. POAG: Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, NTG: Normal Tension Glaucoma, CRA: Central Retinal Artery, NSPCA: Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Arteries, PSV: Peak Systolic Velocity, EDV: End Diastolic Velocity.