Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 24;23:198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09049-8

Table 4.

Patient’s characteristics by care pathway

Variable Emergency + Ward Emergency + Ward + ICU Ward + ICU Emergency + ICU ICU Only p
N = 118 (57) N = 43 (21) N = 27 (13) N = 8 (4) N = 12 (6)
Age, median (IQR) 59 (46; 66) 61 (46; 70) 53 (42; 69) 64 (54; 77) 64 (51; 71) 0.479
Male gender 49 (42) 21 (49) a 15 (56) a 7 (88) a 6 (50) a 0.108
Secondary diagnosis 88 (56) 32 (20) 20 (13) 7 (4) 10 (6) 0.889
 Hypertension 68 (58) 23 (54) 14 (52) 4 (50) 5 (42) 0.847
 Obesity 26 (22) 10 (23) 7 (26) 1 (13) 2 (17) 0.925
 Diabetes 42 (36) 12 (28) 10 (37) 4 (50) 4 (33) 0.861
OSCI < 0.001
 Dead 10 (9) 12 (28) a 2 (7) a 7 (88) a 11 (92) a
 Severe** 0 (0) 31 (72) 25 (93) 1 (13) 1 (8)
 Mild 108 (92) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
LoS, median (IQR) 5 (2; 9) 19 (13; 32)a 14 (9; 23)a 16 (7; 26)a 18 (8; 31)b < 0.001

Data expressed as n (%), unless specified otherwise. Length of Stay (LoS) expressed as days

OSCI Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement, LoS Length of Stay

*p-value for the comparison between care pathways using Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-square test. **All patients admitted to the ICU were categorized as severe at OSCI. Pairwise comparison with Dunn’s test result: a. p < 0.001 vs. Emergency + Ward. b. p = 0.02 vs. Emergency + Ward