Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;13(4):794. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040794

Table 2.

Visual analysis scores.

Reader 1 Reader 2
Score * p Value ** Score * p Value **
Conventional DL Conventional DL
Depiction
of primary lesion
4.455 ± 0.857 4.673 ± 0.695 0.121 4.000 ± 1.089 4.364 ± 0.969 0.049
Noise 4.073 ± 0.663 4.782 ± 0.498 <0.001 3.855 ± 0.621 4.491 ± 0.573 <0.001
Clarity
of mammary gland
3.909 ± 0.727 4.309 ± 0.836 0.003 3.291 ± 0.737 4.109 ± 0.737 <0.001
Overall
image quality
4.073 ± 0.663 4.636 ± 0.557 <0.001 3.904 ± 0.470 4.473 ± 0.539 <0.001

* Evaluated on a five-point scale (1 = extremely poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, and 5 = excellent); numbers in the table show the average score ± standard deviation. ** Significant values are shown in boldface type. Conventional, positron emission tomography (PET) with conventional reconstruction; DL, PET with deep learning restoration.