| Conflict actors |
Groups or institutions collectively |
There’s definitely teams. (23) |
| Single individuals |
It’s always a history of person. And if two persons […] respect themselves, [the discussion] will be constructive, even though they have different opinions. (27) |
| Own role |
Determine which side is right |
I can, hopefully very objectively, decide if a process is possible or not. (35) |
| Provide information |
[W]hoever finally finds out which theory is the right one […], I hope that I contributed enough information for the final answer. (28) |
| Defend or advance a specific side |
I hope that I would […], excite people on the main road to try out the side road and widen their theoretical concept. (19) |
| Actively try to defuse conflict |
My role would be a mediator […] I do think that I have input on how that discussion should be held. (9) |
| Cause of conflict |
Active (willing) violation of rules or boundaries |
You shouldn’t be dogmatic about your research. And I think that’s a lesson we have to learn. (8) |
| Natural part of the process or of the actors involved |
That’s how we go from one point to more knowledge, right? To challenge the views, to challenge the beliefs, to challenge the established science. (21) |
| There is no conflict |
I went to several meetings where these questions were discussed […] and there the discussion was very open. (15) |
| Lack of information |
[T]he chemists or the physicists, they think other about things. (37) |
