Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov 26;71(2):588–598. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18128

Table 3.

Summary of vulnerabilities and additional protections illustrated in the example studies.

Principle Wrong Example Additional protection
Respect for persons Inadequate understanding in informed consent Informed consent is sought from PLWD who lack decision-making capacity Formal capacity assessments
Surrogate consent from substitute decision-makers (e.g., family caregivers or government-affiliated agents)
Participant assent
Inadequate voluntariness in informed consent PLWD feel as though they must participate in research when approached by LTC staff Employ researchers with no affiliation to the LTC home to seek informed consent
Patient advocates to ensure that prospective research participants understand that participation is voluntary
Invasion of privacy Direct observation of PLWD by research personnel during baths Utilize well-trained LTC home staff as research partners for data collection
Stakeholder engagement (e.g., LTC home staff, management, residents, and family caregivers)
Beneficence Risks of therapeutic procedures are high compared to potential benefits Physically frail individual in a trial of a group exercise intervention Additional supervision during exercise sessions
Risks of non-therapeutic procedures are not minimized consistent with sound scientific design Distress while filling out questionnaire for data collection Researcher supervision during data collection
Family caregivers or familiar LTC home staff to complete questionnaire by proxy
Justice Unjust impact on care Non-participant exposure to research procedures Gatekeeper permission from LTC home administrators