TABLE 3.
Strain name | Relevant genotypea | No. of INT1-induced filamentsb | Filament shapec |
---|---|---|---|
YJB2714 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB2715 | abp1Δ | +++ | wt |
YJB3054 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB3053 | sac6Δ | +++ | |
YJB3321 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB2520 | pea2/dfg9-100 | +++ | wt |
YJB3329 | srv2-100 | + | sh |
YJB3331 | bni1-100 | + | sh, shm |
YJB2623 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB2622 | vrp1Δ | + | sh |
YJB3057 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB3056 | rvs167Δ | ++ | sh |
YJB3156 | wild type | ++++ | |
YJB3155 | sla1-Δ1 | + | sh |
YJB3156 | Wild type | +++ | |
YJB3157 | sla2Δ | + | sh |
Complete genotypes of the strains are listed in Table 1.
Relative proportion of cells exhibiting INT1-induced filaments. In each case, the strain was compared with the appropriate isogenic or congenic wild-type strain listed in Table 1. +++, similar to wild type; ++, ∼25 to 75% of wild-type levels; +, less than 25% of wild-type levels of filament formation.
Appearance of filaments relative to how they appeared in the isogenic or congenic wild-type strains. wt, filaments were indistinguishable from wild-type filaments; sh, average filament length was shorter than in the relevant wild-type strain; shm, polarized cells appeared similar to mating projections (shmoos).