Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):325–335. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.42

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in review .

First author, Year, References Study type Study setting Study Zone Age range included (in years) Place, State Sample size
Bhatt, 201833 Cross-sectional study Urban South 18-21 Mangalore, Karnataka 575
Nagarjuna, 201634 Cross-sectional study Both South  ≥ 20 Nellore, Andhra Pradesh 600
Reddy, 201635 Cross-sectional study Urban South  ≥ 20 Hyderabad, Telangana 1017
Salunke, 201936 Cross-sectional study Rural West  ≥ 60 Pune, Maharashtra 135
Pradeep, 201632 Cross-sectional study Both South  ≥ 16 Krishna, Andhra Pradesh 2934
Gautam, 201237 Cross-sectional study Both North 25-55 Sunder Nagar, Himachal Pradesh 300
Rambabu, 201838 Cross-sectional study Both South 18-65 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 1155
Sreenivasan, 201539 Cross-sectional study Both South  ≥ 18 Dharwad, Karnataka 378
Deolia, 202040 Cross-sectional study Rural West  ≥ 18 Maharashtra 700
Kahar, 201641 Cross-sectional study Rural Central  ≥ 18 Ramgarh, Madhya Pradesh 35
Gupta, 201531 Cross-sectional study Rural West  ≥ 20 Western Rajasthan 5476
Kadaluru et al 201242 Cross-sectional study Urban South 18-55 Bangalore, Karnataka 246
Kakatkar, 201143 Cross-sectional study Rural West 25-45 Udaipur, Rajasthan 427
Basu, 202044 Cross-sectional study Urban Central 35-55 NCT Delhi 289
Barman, 201945 Cross-sectional study Rural East 18-37 Bhubaneswar, Orissa 300
Baskaradoss, 202046 Cross-sectional study Both South 18-35 Kerala 450
Bhaskar, 202047 Cross-sectional study Both South 20-59 Kottayam, Kerala 400
Nija, 202048 Cross-sectional study Both South 18-34 Kochi, Kerala 194
Khoisnam, 202249 Cross-sectional study Urban Central 20-59 Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 500
Bhuvaneshwari, 202250 Cross-sectional study Both South 65-74 Devanagari, Karnataka 1440
Fotedar, 201251 Cross-sectional study Both North 25-45 Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 304