Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 25;34:100647. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100647

Table 1.

Characteristics of 18 included studies of adoption, use and effectiveness of DCT interventions in the Western Pacific Region.

Country/area DCT characteristics
1. Name
2. Tool
3. Technology
4. Data processing
Study ID Aim of study Study design Data collection period Population description Method of recruitment Number of participants included in analysis
Australia 1. COVIDSafe
2. Smartphone application
3. Proximity trails (Bluetooth)
4. Centralised
Garrett 202114 Assess attitudes towards three tracking technologies prior to the launch of COVIDSafe, and compare to usage of the COVIDSafe app after launch. Repeated cross-sectional study Apr-20 Representative sample of the Australian public aged 18 years and older stratified by gender, age and state. Online survey 878
Vogt 20225 Assess the effectiveness and usefulness of COVIDSafe in New South Wales. Mixed methods study May-20 – Nov-20 All individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection aged 12 years and older in NSW during the study period. Public health data registry 619
Thomas 202015 Investigate the uptake of the Australian Government's COVIDSafe app among Australians and examine the reasons why some Australians have not downloaded the app. Cross-sectional study May-20 Australian residents aged 18 years or older. Participants were excluded if they were a health care professional or had been tested for COVID-19. Online survey 1500
Degeling 202116 Report on six online deliberative workshops in New South Wales to provide recommendations on the appropriateness of using the COVIDSafe app to enhance contact tracing capacity in Australia. Qualitative research Jun-20 – Jul-20 Research volunteers and respondents to a social media campaign. Workshop participants were selected from the convenience sampling frame based on representative socio-demographic characteristics. Voluntary 43
Lockey 202117 Profile adopters and non-adopters of Australia's COVIDSafe app. Cross-sectional study Jun-20 – Jul-20 Australian adults aged over 18 years Research panel database 2575
Fiji 1. careFIJI
2. Smartphone application
3. Proximity trails (Bluetooth); QR code location check-in
4. Decentralised
Chand 202118 Discuss rollout of the careFIJI app for COVID-19 contact tracing in Fiji. Text and opinion N/A N/A N/A N/A
Japan 1. COCOA
2. Smartphone application
3. Proximity trails (Bluetooth)
4. Decentralised
Kawakami 202119 Investigate the association of downloading a COVID-19 contact tracing app, the COVID-19 Contact Confirming Application (COCOA), released by the Japanese government, with worry about COVID-19 and psychological distress in a sample of employed adults in Japan. Cohort study May-20 – Aug-20 Full-time employees Online survey 996
Gotanda 202120 Examine whether the practice of preventive measures against COVID-19 differs by one's level of trust in government. Cross-sectional study Aug-20 – Sep-20 Japanese individuals aged 15–79 years participating in the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey Online survey 25,482
Shoji 202121 Examine the role of individual prosociality and other factors such as perceived risk and trust in government, in encouraging the usage of contact tracing apps in Japan. Cross-sectional study Dec-20 68,480 people were selected and invited to participate in the survey from 4.65 million registrants of a large survey company in Japan. Online survey 5402
Ishimaru 202122 Identify industry and workplace characteristics associated with the downloading of COCOA, the COVID-19 contact tracing app in Japan. Cross-sectional study Dec-20 Participants in an online cohort study on COVID-19 and work. Online survey 27,036
New Zealand 1. NZ COVID Tracer
2. Smartphone application
3. QR code location check-in
4. Decentralised
Tretiakov 202123 Explore how users experience the NZ COVID Tracer app in their everyday contexts, and identify determinants of app use. Qualitative research Oct-20 – Nov-20 Residents in Auckland aged 18–64 years who were users of the NZ COVID Tracer app. Online survey 34
Gasteiger 202124 Explore the barriers and facilitators to the general public's use of the NZ COVID Tracer app. Cross-sectional study Not stated Adults 18 years and older participating in the COVID-19 Stress and Health study Voluntary 380
Ali 202225 Describe usage behaviour, motivations for use and determinants of use of the NZ COVID Tracer app in the general population. Cross-sectional study Not stated Self-selected respondents to online survey Online survey 261
Singapore 1. TraceTogether
2. Smartphone application
3. Proximity trails (Bluetooth)
4. Centralised
Saw 202126 Identify the characteristics of individuals or factors associated with voluntary downloads of TraceTogether in Singapore. Cross-sectional study Apr-20 – Jul-20 Adults aged 21 years or older who were resident in Singapore for a minimum of two years Online survey 505
Huang 202027 Compare the performance of the contact tracing app "TraceTogether” with that of a wearable tag-based real-time locating system (RTLS). Diagnostic test accuracy study May-20 18 physicians during a 10-day posting at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases COVID-19 screening centre, and patients attending the centre over the same time period. Employees 18
Huang 202128 Assess the awareness of, willingness to use (acceptance) and actual use (adoption) of TraceTogether in Singapore. Cross-sectional study Jul-20 – Dec-20 Patients and caregivers attending two outpatient clinics at Tan Tock Seng Hospital Clinic patients 3240
Huang 202229 Assess the factors influencing the acceptance and adoption of TraceTogether during the COVID-19 pandemic. Repeated cross-sectional study Jul-20 – Feb-21 Patients and visitors of two outpatient clinics at Tan Tock Seng Hospital Clinic patients 3943
Lee 202130 Examine normative influences (descriptive and injunctive norms) on TraceTogether device use for contact tracing purposes. Repeated cross-sectional survey Jan-21 – Feb-21 Representative sample of Singapore residents aged 21 years or older who had downloaded TraceTogether or received a token, sampled from a voluntary research panel. Online survey 1137