Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun 11;63(6):1214–1238. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13454

Table 1.

Prevalence Estimates of Elder Abuse According to Population, Survey Method, and Definition

Author, Year Population Age; Sex; Race and Ethnicity Survey Method Participation rate, % Measure No. item Cutoff Points Prevalence
North/South America
 Dong, 201433 3,159 elderly Chinese In Chicago ≥60; 58.9% female In person 91.9 H-S/EAST, VASS 10 ≥1 Items 15.0% since age 60
 Dong, 201433 3,159 elderly Chinese In Chicago ≥60; 58.9% female In person 91.9 CTS; caregiver neglect assessment; financial exploitation assessment 56 a 13.9–25.8% since age 60
 Deliema, 201214 198 Hlspanics In Los Angeles ≥66; 56% female In person 65 University of Southern California Older Adult Conflict Scale 54 ≥1 items 1-year, 40.4%; multiple, 21%
 Dong, 201258 4,627 adults in Chicago ≥65; 64.4% female In person N/A Chicago Elder Self-Neglect Scale 21 ≥1 Items Black: men, 13.2%; women, 10.9% White: men, 2.4%; women, 2.6%
 Lachs, 201154 4, 156 English- or Spanish-speaking community; cognitively Intact older New Yorkers 60–101; 35.5% female; 19.0% black, 75.5% white, 6.0% Hispanic, 0.8% American Indian, 1.2% Asian Telephone N/A CTS 31 a 14.1% since age 60
 Acierno, 20103 5,777 cognitively intact U.S. community population 60–97, 60% female; 88% white, 7% black, 4% Hispanic, 2% American Indian, 1% Asian Random-diglt dialing and computer-assisted interview 69 Interpersonal Violence Measure and Acierno EM Measure 22 ≥1 items Any elder abuse (exclude financial): 10%
 Wiglesworth, 201023 129 older adults with dementia and their caregiver; 77.1 ± 8.0; 45.7% female; 93.8 white, 8.5% Hispanic In-person survey of caregivers N/A CTS, Elder Abuse Instrument, Self-Neglect Assessment Scale NA a 1-year 47.3%; multiple, 14.6%.
 Beach, 201037 903 U.S. community-dwelling older adults with landline, English-speaking, no severe cognitive Impairment ≥60; 73.3% female; 23.3% black, 72.8% white, 3.9% other Random-dlgit dialing, In-person, self-administered 37.7 Modified CTS 12 a 6-month financial exploitation, 3.5%; 6-month psychological mistreatment, 8.2%
 Laumann, 200817 3,005 older adults In the National, Social Life, Health and Aging project 57–85; 51.2% female; 80.7% white, 10.0% black; 6.8% Hispanic; 2.5% other In-person and mall survey 75.5 H-S/EAST, VASS 3 ≥1 Items 1-year: verbal, 9%; financial, 3.5%; physical, 0.2%
 Buri, 200681 498 older adults In the Iowa Medicaid Waiver Program 65–101; 70.9% female; 96% white, 3% black Mail survey 49 Elder Abuse Screen 5 ≥1 items 20.9%: 1 type, 15.8%; 2 types, 4.0%; 3 types, 1.0%
Europe
 Lindert, 201319 4,467 older adults from seven countries in Europe 60–84; 57.3% female In-person and mail survey 45.2 Modified CTS 52 ≥1 Items 1-year, 12.7–30.8%
 Naughton, 201124 2,021 community-dwelling older people In Ireland ≥65; 55% female In person 83 CTS, UK and NY prevalence studies NA a 1-year, 2.2%
 Kissai, 201182 331 older adults In Izmir, Turkey ≥65; 56.8% female In person N/A Investigator-determined 5 a 6-month, 13.3%
 Biggs, 200983 2,111 older adults In the community In United Kingdom ≥66 In person 65 Built on literature 34 a 2.6% with neglect; 1.6% without neglect
 Ajdukovic, 200925 303 older adults in Croatia 65–97; 76.6% female In person NA Elder Abuse in the Family questionnaire 20 NA 1-year, 61.1%
 Cooper, 200984 220 UK caregivers of people with dementia 58–99, 72% female In person 69 Modified CTS 10 Score ≥2 3-month, 52%
 Garre-Olmo, 200985 676 community-dwelling older adults In Girona, Spain ≥75; 58.2% female. In person 82 AMA Screen 9 ≥1 Items 1-year, 29.3%; 2 types, 3.6%; 3 types, 0.1%
 Perez Carceles, 200886 460 older adults in health center in Spain ≥65; 53.3% female In person N/A Canadian Task Force, AMA Screen 19 ≥1 items 44.6%
 Comijs, 199831,32 1,797 older people living Independently In Amsterdam, the Netherlands 69–89; 62.8% female Interview 44.4 CTS, Measure of Wife Abuse, Violence Against Man Scale NA a 1-year, 5.6%; ≥2 types, 0.4%
Asia/Austria
 Wu, 201221 2,039 Chinese older adults in rural China ≥60; 59.9% female In person 90.8 H-S/EAST, VASS NA ≥1 Items 1-year, 36.2%; ≥2 types, 10.5%
 Somjinda Chompunud, 201087 233 cognitively functioning older adults in Thailand 60–90; 73.4% female In person 73.3 Interview guideline for screening for elder abuse 6 ≥1 items 1-year, 14.6%; 1 time, 9.9%; ≥2 times, 4.7%
 Lowenstein, 200927 1,045 community-living older adults from the first national survey In Israel ≥65; 62.5% female In person 75 CTS2, short situational descriptions, Respondents’ Reactions to Aggression NA a 1-year, 35.0%
 Oh, 200922 15,230 older adults In Seoul, Korea ≥65; 65.3% female In person N/A Compiled through literature 25 ≥2 times 1-month, 6.3%
 Lee, 200888 1,000 primary caregivers of family members with disabilities In Seoul, Korea 65–102; 69.5% female In person N/A N/A 6 a Not answered question, 10.5%; yelled, 10.9%; confined, 18%; hit, 9.7%; neglected, 13.6%
 Dong, 200744 412 cognitively intact community-living persons from medical clinics in China ≥60, 34% female Self-administered survey 82.4 H-S/EAST, VASS 13 ≥1 items 35.2% since age 60; 1 type, 64%; 2 types, 16%; ≥3 types, 20%
 Sasaki, 200789 412 pairs of disabled older adults and family caregivers in Japan Mean 80.5, 60.1% female Self-administrated survey 70.0 Checklist developed by literature 9 ≥1 Items 6-month, 34.9%
 Chokkanathan, 200626 400 community-living cognitively intact older adults In India ≥65; 49.5% female In person 80 CTS 18 a 1-year, 14%
 Yan, 200131 355 community-living older adults In Hong Kong, China ≥60; 62% female Self-administered N/A Revised CTS 25 ≥1 items 1-year, 21.4%; types, 17.1% multiple
Africa
 Cadmus, 201220 404 elderly women In Oyo state, southwestern Nigeria ≥60; 100% female; 100% Yoruba Semistructured questionnaires N/A Standardized questionnaire developed by World Health Organization 18 Score ≥1 1-year, 30%
 Rahman, 201228 1,106 older adults living at home In rural area of Mansoura city, Dakahilia Governate, Egypt ≥60; 53.2% female In-person interview 95.3 Questionnaire to elicit abuse 15 ≥1 Items 1-year, 43.7%; 1 type, 35.4%; 2 types, 3.8%; 3 types, 3.8%; 4 types, 0.6%

For detailed table on the definitional criteria for specific subtypes of elder abuse and its prevalence, see online Table S1.

a

Cutoff varies according to subtype of abuse and more detailed information regarding the cut-off point of each type of abuse please see the appendix.

H-S/EAST = Hwalek-Sengstok Elder Abuse Screening Test; VASS = Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale; CTS = Conflict Tactics Scale; AM A = American Medical Association, N/A = not applicable.