Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043567

Table 3.

Mann–Whitney tests for differences in scale dimensions’ mean scores between gender sub-samples and low versus high levels of body appreciation (BAS-2).

N M SD Z (p) BAS N M SD Z (p)
Thin body internalization Female 105 2.8248 1.00793 −2.380 Low 70 2.9771 1.04925 −2.884
Male 29 2.3310 0.89964 p = 0.017 High 64 2.4344 0.87327 p = 0.004
Athletic body internalization Female 105 2.4933 1.00425 n.s. Low 70 2.6714 1.07193 n.s.
Male 29 2.8621 1.10078 High 64 2.4656 0.98565
Family
pressure
Female 105 2.1214 1.04589 n.s. Low 70 2.3036 1.00532 −2.897
Male 29 1.9741 0.94336 High 64 1.8555 0.99782 p = 0.004
Peer
pressure
Female 105 1.5762 0.81388 n.s. Low 70 1.8821 0.93029 −4.081
Male 29 1.7241 0.85394 High 64 1.3086 0.55051 p < 0.001
Media
pressure
Female 105 3.4310 1.32037 −3.182 Low 70 3.6107 1.20809 −3.244
Male 29 2.4569 1.39685 p = 0.001 High 64 2.7930 1.46083 p = 0.001
SATAQ-4 Female 105 2.4893 0.69497 n.s. Low 70 2.6890 0.70707 −4.098
Male 29 2.2697 0.69891 High 64 2.1714 0.58487 p < 0.001
BAS-2 Female 105 3.6124 0.73481 n.s.
Male 29 3.8310 0.70158
CSAB Female 105 1.5000 0.83141 −2.997 Low 70 1.7071 0.96327 −5.135
Male 29 1.2414 0.53561 p = 0.003 High 64 1.1563 0.33972 p < 0.001
ACSS
intrapersonal
Female 105 4.9257 1.29325 −2.261 Low 70 4.8229 1.19881 n.s.
Male 29 4.1862 1.52590 p = 0.024 High 64 4.7031 1.55287
ACSS
consider
Female 105 1.9562 0.96436 −2.019 Low 70 2.1771 1.24064 n.s.
Male 29 2.5862 1.40502 p = 0.044 High 64 2.0000 0.92376
ACSS
social
Female 105 4.0362 1.78601 −2.471 Low 70 4.0686 1.81679 n.s.
Male 29 3.1448 1.54633 p = 0.013 High 64 3.5969 1.69761
ACSS Female 105 3.6394 1.11158 n.s. Low 70 3.6895 1.18780 n.s.
Male 29 3.3057 1.31276 High 64 3.4333 1.12506
CBFS
Total
Female 105 26.2095 2.85783 n.s. Low 70 25.5857 3.15995 −2.448
Male 29 25.8966 2.84536 High 64 26.7500 2.33673 p = 0.014
BMI Female 105 18.5048 3.39107 −4.828 Low 70 19.1440 3.74222 n.s.
Male 29 21.7752 3.04891 p < 0.001 High 64 19.2876 3.40933