Table 4.
Evolving Methods for CTC Detection and Characterization | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Commercially Available Formats or Providers |
Mode of Enrichment |
Mode of Detection |
Antibodies | Material | Advantages | Disadvantages | References | ||
Enrichment techniques | Morphology-based approaches | Deepcell | Deepcell platform (Deepcell, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) | Isolation of viable cells based on morphological distinction | Images are analyzed using deep learning AI | - | Blood and other body fluids | Permits cluster analysis and further molecular characterization of CTCs | Not clinically validated | [115] |
Nanotube-CTC-chip | - | CTCs adhere to a carbon nanotube surface via filaments extending from the main body of the cell | CTCs are immunostained on-chip and analyzed using automated fluorescence microscopy | DAPI, CKs 8/18, Her2, EGFR, and anti-CD45 | Blood | Antigen- and size-independent capture | RBC lysis is necessary | [23] | ||
TetherChip | - | CTCs are captured based on the affinity of their microtentacles for a polyelectrolyte multilayer | Immunofluorescence staining with Hoechst, WGA, and GFP followed by fluorescence microscopy analysis | - | Blood | Preserves microtentacle structure after fixation and isolation from blood; enables testing of functional phenotypes in CTCs | Only tested on cell lines at the time of writing | [24] | ||
Immunology-based approaches | GILUPI CellCollector | GILUPI CellCollector (GILUPI GmbH, Potsdam, Germany) | CTCs captured by antibodies immobilized on a hydrogel | Immunofluorescence staining and molecular analysis (e.g., PCR, sequencing, gene expression analysis) | EpCAM | Blood | Enriches CTCs directly from bloodstream rather than volume-limited blood samples; enrichment time is 30 min | Used only for enrichment of CTCs directly from patient’s bloodstream | [116,117] | |
3D conductive scaffold microchip | - | CTCs are captured on a 3D conductive scaffold made from porous polydimethylsiloxane with immobilized gold nanotubes (Au-NT) coated with an anti-EpCAM antibody | Immunocytochemistry using FITC-CK, PE-CD45, and DAPI | EpCAM | Blood | Captured cells can be reversibly released with high viability; high sensitivity | CTC clusters released less efficiently than single CTCs because of re-capture by the 3D scaffold | [118] | ||
3D nanoforest array | - | Cellular filopodia of CTCs interact with lateral branches of Zn(OH)F nanowires conjugated to an anti-EpCAM antibody | Immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence microscopy analysis | EpCAM, CD45, CK | Blood | Large binding surfaces provide many binding sites for CTC capture | Only tested on cell lines at the time of writing | [119] | ||
3D-printed functionalized device | - | 3D-printed channel whose inner surface was functionalized with anti-EpCAM | Confocal laser scanning microscopy | EpCAM | Blood | Microfluidic device with a large binding surface area | Only tested on cell lines at the time of writing | [120] | ||
Detection techniques | Epic Sciences | Epic Sciences (Epic Sciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) | - | Pyxis™—whole slide fluorescent scanner | Cytokeratin, CD45, DAPI, and specific antibodies | Blood | Enrichment-free; cancer profiling combining CTC technology with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and immune cell analysis | Samples must be sent to the company for analysis, only for prostate and breast cancer | [121,122,124] | |
AI nanoarray | - | Detects both cancer cells and VOCs from cancer cells and their microenvironment | Gas chromatography linked with mass spectrometry | - | Blood | High sensitivity and specificity for early detection | Only tested on cell lines and a mouse model at the time of writing | [125,126] | ||
Approaches combining CTC enrichment and detection | 3D-printed microfluidic device | - | WBCs are captured in the device’s immunocapture channels; RBCs, platelets, and all nucleated cells migrate to a membrane micropore filter | CTCs are immunostained on-chip and analyzed using fluorescence microscopy | CD45 | Blood | Label-free negative depletion of CTCs; isolation of very small CTCs | Only tested on cell lines at the time of writing | [127] | |
CTCelect | CTCelect system (Fraunhofer Institute for Microengineering and Microsystems, IMM, Mainz, Germany) | Combines immunomagnetic enrichment with microfluidic sorting of fluorescence-activated cells | Fluorescence microscopy | EpCAM | Blood | Fully automated; permits further molecular characterization of CTCs | Captures only single cells, not clusters | [128,129] | ||
VyCAP | VyCAP technology (VyCap B.V., Enschede, The Netherlands) | Size-based filtration through a microsieve filter chip | Fluorescence microscopy with automated imaging system | CK, CD16, and CD45. Other cancer-specific labels can also be used (e.g., MUC-1, PDL-1) | Blood | Fully automated; filtration under low pressure, which minimizes damage to captured cells | Not clinically validated | [130,131] | ||
MyCTC chip | - | CTCs are captured on microfluidic chip with a polydimethylsiloxane upper layer and a rigid cyclic olefin copolymer underlayer | Cultivation of captured CTCs | - | Blood or other body fluids | Label- and antigen-free; captures clusters with high efficiency | Not clinically validated | [132] |