Table 13.
Acoustic FD methods applied to belt conveyor idlers via ML Models.
| Authors | Detection Methods | Accuracy | Main Findings | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ericeira et al. [50] | The ultrasound sensing combined with RF and MLP machine learning techniques and signal pattern recognition. | Four experiments using different numbers of samples. The best result was achieved in the fourth experiment by extracting from the FFT applied in every 5 s of the 20 recordings divided into 40 parts the MLP10, which in one case attained 89.47% of correctly classified instances. | The results show that the detection performance depends on the features they use to input the classifier. | When frequency domain features are used with more data, the proposed methods demonstrate the best accuracy. | To achieve the highest degree of accuracy, it is necessary to tune the number of trees in RF, the number of neuron layers in MLP, etc. |
| Liu et al. [8] | MFCCs as features and GBDT algorithm for classification. | Detection accuracy of 94.53%. | The proposed MFCCs and GBDT approach is a viable method for detecting idler roll failures based on sound signals. | A Gradient Boost algorithm with self-learning automatically determines which MFCC feature to apply at which step and what threshold value to determine for this feature. | Window size for extracting MFCC significantly impacts the accuracy performance of GBDT models. |
| Rocha et al. [59] | For the detection of roller failures, a fast Fourier transform and means of the magnitude of the sound signal are used along with a random forest algorithm. | The trained model has an accuracy of 95% in identifying damaged bearings noise correctly. | Test results demonstrated that ROSI could stand up to harsh operating conditions while carrying out all necessary inspection tasks in a mining site, establishing it as a disruptive solution for belt conveyor. | The RF is simple to use and shows better results. | An unblanched dataset was used to train the method. |
| Yang et al. [40] | DNN, DCNN, SVM and KNN. | The accuracy is 90% KNN. The detection accuracy of SVM is 91.9% DNN: The average accuracy is 94.4% DCNN: The classification accuracy is 98%. |
Based on the results, the fault detection system works very well for roller fault detection, with an accuracy rate of more than 90.0%. | Models based on deep learning produce better results than traditional models. | Developing a deep learning model requires a large amount of data to train and build a robust model. |
| Peng et al. [24] | Wavelet packet transformation and CNN have been used. | The classification accuracy rate of the mean as a feature is 86%, and the classification accuracy rate of the standard deviation as a feature is 93%. | According to the experiment results, using the standard deviation as the data feature is more effective than the mean in detecting roller faults. | A CNN can handle a large amount of input data and take into account the location information between the data. | After extracting wavelet packet transformation, data from the lowest frequency band can significantly affect CNN performance. |
| Xiao-ping Jiang and Guan qiang Cao [41] | Wavelet transform and Neural network | The accuracy rate can reach more than 96%. | In belt conveyors, fault characteristics are contained in fault sounds and can be obtained by adding the energy of each band after the wavelet transform has been applied. | The neural network can easily recognize and classify faults. | The accuracy of the method is affected by environmental noise and the sound of the belt conveyor. |