Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 25;23:22. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00532-3

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of CECT and EOB-MRI for detecting viable HCC with corresponding histopathologic abnormality

Size CECT EOB-MRI P-value
Se Sp NPV PPV Acc Se Sp NPV PPV Acc Sen Sp
overall R1 58.3 (21/36) 86.6 (58/67) 79.5 (58/73) 70 (21/30) 76.7 (79/103) 66.7 (22/33) 88.5 (54/61) 83.1 (54/65) 75.9 (22/29) 80.9 (76/94)
R2 54.5 (18/33) 91.7 (66/72) 81.5 (66/81) 75 (18/24) 80 (84/105) 60 (21/35) 95.8 (69/72) 83.1 (69/83) 87.5 (21/24) 84.1 (90/107)
Pooled 56.5 89.2 63.2 92.5 0.312 0.312
<  2 cm R1 81 (17/21) 50 (9/18) 69.2 (9/13) 65.4 (17/26) 66.7 (26/39) 87.5 (14/16) 50 (7/14) 77.8 (7/9) 66.7 (14/21) 70 (21/30)
R2 66.7 (10/15) 75 (12/16) 70.6 12/17) 71.4 10/14) 71 (22/31) 82.4 (14/17) 83.3 (10/12) 76.9 (10/13) 87.5 (14/16) 82.8 (24/29)
Pooled 75 61.8 84.8 65.4 0.037 0.037
≥ 2 cm R1 26.7 (4/15) 100 (49/49) 81.7 (49/60) 100 (4/4) 82.8 (53/64) 47.1 (8/17) 100 (45/45) 83.3 (45/54) 100 (8/8) 85.5 (53/62)
R2 44.4 (8/18) 96.4 (54/56) 84.4 54/64) 80 8/10) 83.8 (62/74) 38.9 (7/18) 98.3 (59/60) 84.3 (59/70) 87.5 (7/8) 84.6 (66/78)
Pooled 36.4 98.1 42.9 99 0.504 0.504

Data are percentages, with numerators and denominators in parentheses

Acc accuracy, CECT contrast-enhanced computed tomography, EOB-MRI Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, R1 reader 1, R2 reader 2, Se sensitivity, Sp specificity