Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 4;24(4):3089. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043089

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cell viability of SH-SY5Y cells. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. (A) Cell viability of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to Aβo (1,5, 10 µM) for 3 h. Each value is expressed relative to the viability of control (set to 100%). In the absence of Aβo, the absorbance value of control for 3 h was 1.521 ± 0.0184 (mean + S.E.M). †, p < 0.0001 for control versus Aβo-exposed cells (n = 8, Tukey). $, p < 0.0001 for 1 µM Aβo-exposed versus 5 µM Aβo-exposed cells (n = 8, Tukey). (B) Cell viability of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to 5 µM Aβo and treated with Aβo + curcumin (1, 10 µM), Aβo + GT863 (1, 10 µM) for 3 h. Each value is expressed relative to the viability of control cultures (set to 100%). +: inclusion of 5 µM Aβo, curcumin, GT863; −: non-inclusion. The p-values in ANOVA were < 0.001. Each value expresses the mean + S.E.M. of at least 3 independent experiments. In the absence of Aβo, the absorbance value of control for 3 h was 1.243 ± 0.068 (mean ± S.E.M). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.0001 vs. control cells. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. Aβo-exposed cells (n = 8, Tukey).