Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;23(4):2328. doi: 10.3390/s23042328

Table 5.

The semiconductor humidity-nanosensor comparison.

Sensing Material Measurement Type RH Range (% RH) Response/Sensitivity Response and Recovery Time Refs
CdS Resistive 17–85% NA ~60 s [36]
CdS/Polyaniline Resistive 11–95% NA ~8 s [37]
CdS Resistive 5–99% ~60%
(response)
~55 s (normal)~3 s (forced) [38]
SnS nanoflake Current 3–99% 2,491,000%
(response)
6/4 s [107]
SnS2 Resistive 2–99% 154,000%
(response)
13.2/0.87 s [108]
CZTS Resistive 10–90% 10.77 MΩ/%RH 7.4/58.1 s [109]
[(Me3)DAB(Me3)] PbI4·H2O Current 10–100% ~1,000,000%
(response)
NA [39]
SnO2/grapheme oxide Capacitance 11–97% 1604.89 pF/%RH
(sensitivity)
102/6 s [102]
T3C2/polyelectrolyte Resistive 10−70% 1600%
(response)
110/220 ms [103]
Ti3C2/TiO2 Composite Capacitance 7−97% 1614 pF/% RH 0.5/2 s [104]
CoTiO3/TiO2 Composite Resistive 11–95% 15,723%
(response)
NA [105]