Table 3.

The quality assessment of the included case reports using the (JBI) Quality Assessment Tool.

Study ID	The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports								Total Quality Score, (%)
	Q (1)	Q (2)	Q (3)	Q (4)	Q (5)	Q (6)	Q (7)	Q (8)
Burrows 2021 [16]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Cellina 2022 [17]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Čenščák 2021 [18]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Cirillo 2022 [19]	NO	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	62.50%
Colella 2021 [20]	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Ercoli 2021 [2]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Finsterer 2021 [21]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Iftikhar 2021 [22]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Introna 2021 [23]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Ish 2021 [24]	YES	NO	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	62.50%
Manea 2021 [25]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Martin-Villares 2021 [26]	NO	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	NO	YES	75%
Mason 2021 [27]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Mussatto2021 [28]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Nasuelli 2021 [29]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Nishizawa 2021 [30]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	NO	YES	62.50%
Obermann 2021 [31]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	88%
Pothiawala 2021 [32]	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	NO	NO	YES	62.50%
Poudel 2022 [33]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Repajic 2021 [34]	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Shalabi 2022 [35]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Yu 2021 [36]	YES	NO	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	75%
Zhang 2022 [37]	YES	NO	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	62.50%