Table 2.

Adjusted * relative risk of excessive and inadequate gestational weight gain rate by diet quality defined by HEI-2010, DASH, aMED, and EDIP.

	Diet Quality Index
	HEI-2010 1	DASH 2	aMED 3	EDIP 4
Excessive GWG
Good quality	1 (reference)	1 (reference)	1 (reference)	1 (reference)
Poor quality	1.03 (1.00, 1.06)	1.02 (0.99, 1.05)	1.01 (0.98, 1.04)	1.00 (0.97, 1.03)
Inadequate GWG
Good quality	1 (reference)	1 (reference)	1 (reference)	1 (reference)
Poor quality	1.00 (0.92, 1.09)	0.94 (0.86, 1.03)	1.04 (0.94, 1.15)	0.98 (0.89, 1.08)

Bolded estimates denote p ≤ 0.05. * All models adjusted for physical activity, education level, parity, household income, race-ethnicity, age at delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, and total energy intake. ¹ Maximum score is 100. Higher score indicates better alignment with dietary recommendations. Good-quality diet was defined by the 75th percentile or higher (≥78.7). ² Maximum score is 40. Higher score indicates better alignment with dietary recommendations. Good-quality diet was defined by the 75th percentile or higher (≥28). ³ Maximum score is 8. Higher score indicates better alignment with dietary recommendations. Good-quality diet was defined by the 75th percentile or higher (≥6). ⁴ No maximum score. Lower score indicates less inflammatory diet. Good-quality diet was defined by the 25th percentile or lower (≤−0.20).