Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 21;15(2):365. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020365

Table 1.

Pros and cons overview of principal EV isolation methods.

EV Isolation Methods
Method Pros Cons
Differential ultracentrifugation (dUC)
  • Cost-effective [1]

  • Well established and widely employed [134]

  • Lipoprotein contamination [134]

  • Time consuming [1]

  • Massive EV aggregation and damaging [1]

Density gradient UC
  • EV subpopulations distinction [1]

  • Need for operator high training [1]

  • Low final purity [1]

  • Small sample volumes can be processed [1]

Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)
  • No high-density lipoprotein contamination [111]

  • Serum albumin removal [111]

  • Fast and cheap method [134]

  • EV integrity preservation [1]

  • Difficulties in EV subpopulations distinction [111]

  • Co-isolation of non-EV particles above the cut-off [1,134]

Immuno-capture
  • Selective EV isolation from different cell types [111]

  • Easy method, simple instrumentations [111]

  • Expensive ligands [111]

  • Need for optimization of a mild elution process [111]

Ultrafiltration (UF)
  • Simple and cheap method [1,111]

  • Protein contamination [111]

  • Vesicle damaging [1]

Asymmetrial flow field-flow fractionation (AF4)
  • Gentle fractionation [111]

  • Provides a large range of size-based separation [106]

  • No lipoprotein contamination [111]

  • Small sample volumes can be processed [106]

  • Co-isolation of particles with the same hydrodynamic size [106]