Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 15;13(2):531. doi: 10.3390/life13020531

Table 1.

Summary of quantitative clinical studies to diagnose increased intracranial pressure.

Author and Year Study Design Study Population Intervention Comparator Results
Kim et al., 2021 [4] Prospective observational study 199 adults with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD CT scan Median sonographic ONSD wider in raised ICP patients (5.7 mm vs. 4.3 mm)
Ideal cut point of 5.3 mm
Sensitivity 75%
Specificity 91%
Hanafi et al., 2019 [5] Prospective observational study 112 adults with traumatic headache vs. controls Sonographic ONSD CT scan Mean sonographic ONSD wider in patients (6.06 mm vs. 3.04 mm)
Ideal cut point of 5.3 mm yielding:
Sensitivity 96%
Specificity 71%
Ohle et al., 2015 [6] Meta-analysis 478 adults across 12 studies with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD CT scan Sensitivity 96%
Specificity 92%
+LR 12.5
−LR 0.05
Robba et al., 2018 [7] Meta-analysis 320 adults across 7 studies with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD Invasive ICP measurement DOR 68
+LR 5.4
−LR 0.09
Aletreby et al., 2022 [8] Meta-analysis 619 adults across 16 studies with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD Invasive ICP measurement Sensitivity 90%
Specificity 85%
+LR 6.1
−LR 0.11
DOR 46.7
Koziarz et al., 2019 [9] Meta-analysis 4551 patients of any age across 71 studies with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD Any reference standard (CT or invasive ICP measurement) Traumatic brain injury:
Sensitivity 97%
Specificity 86%
+LR 6.9
−LR 0.04
Non-traumatic injury
Sensitivity 92%
Specificity 86%
+LR 6.9
−LR 0.09
Optimal cut point of 5.0 mm
Kim et al., 2019 [10] Meta-analysis 352 adults across 6 studies with suspected raised ICP Sonographic ONSD with a cut point of 5.0 mm in all included studies CT scan Sensitivity 99%
Specificity 73%
+LR 4.6
−LR 0.05
DOR 178
Fernando et al., 2019 [11] Meta-analysis 5123 adults across 40 studies with suspected raised ICP Physical exam, sonographic ONSD, or CT imaging Invasive ICP measurement or craniotomy with operative diagnosis of raised ICP Pupillary dilation:
Sensitivity 28%
Specificity 86%
Motor posturing:
Sensitivity 54%
Specificity 64%
Decreased level of consciousness:
Sensitivity 76%
Specificity 40%
Sonographic ONSD:
AUROC 0.94
CT absence or compression of basal cisterns:
Sensitivity 86%
Specificity 61%
CT any midline shift:
Sensitivity 81%
Specificity 43%
CT severe midline shift:
Sensitivity 21%
Specificity 89%