Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):304. doi: 10.3390/metabo13020304

Table 3.

Evaluation results of ML methods on (a) the full data set and (b) the suspected diagnosis data set. Methods are applied to all 53 features, 5 features selected with ANOVA, or LDA dimensions. The methods were evaluated by false negatives (FN) and false positives (FP) on the training and test set. Abbreviations: Asa—argininosuccinate, aas—age at sampling, BIO—biotinidase, C14OH—3-OH-tetradecanoylcarnitine, C16:1OH—3-OH hexadecenoylcarnitine, C5—isovalerylcarnitine, FN—false negatives, FP—false positives, His—histidine, LDA—linear discriminant analysis, LR—logistic regression, MeGlut—3-methylglutarylcarnitine, RR—ridge logistic regression, SVM—support vector machine, Trp—tryptophan, Val—valine.

Method Features (Number) Train FN Train FP Test FN Test FP
(a) Full data set
LR all (53) 0 65 0 27
RR all(53) 6 20,065 3 5005
SVM all(53) 1 35 0 9
LR C5, C16:1OH, aas, Val, BIO 0 167 0 42
RR C5, C16:1OH, aas, Val, BIO 5 6026 1 1577
SVM C5, C16:1OH, aas, Val, BIO 1 68 0 15
(b) Suspected diagnosis data set
LR all (53) 0 29 0 7
RR all (53) 0 18 0 5
SVM all (53) 0 20 0 6
LR Trp, C14OH, MeGlut, His, Asa 0 35 0 6
RR Trp, C14OH, MeGlut, His, Asa 0 35 0 6
SVM Trp, C14OH, MeGlut, His, Asa 0 37 0 6
LDA-LR LDA dimensions 0 9 0 10
LDA-RR LDA dimensions 0 22 0 12
LDA-SVM LDA dimensions 0 12 0 10