Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;9(1):264–273. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010021

Table 5.

Comparison between the LDRL for MPI imaging from our study against the recognised MPI international studies for CTDIvol and DLP in framework of MPI SPECT/CT or PET/CT scan.

Authors Modality Radiotracer Clinical
Purpose
MPI CT DRL Values
CTDIvol (mGy) DLP (mGy.cm)
DRL (Statistical Analysis) 50th 75th 50th 75th
Rinscheid et al. (DE, 2022) [13] SPECT/CT and PET/CT 99mTc and 18F-FDG AC - 3.1 - 81
Bebbington et al. (Nordic, 2019) [14] SPECT/CT and PET/CT 99mTc and 18F-FDG 1.6 2.2 35 53
Iball et al. (UK, 2017) [15] SPECT/CT 99mTc AC 1.6 2.1 34 36
Abe et al. (JP, 2020) [16] SPECT/CT 9mTc AC+Dx 3.2 4.50 89 180
Abe et al. (JP, 2020) [16] PET/CT 18F-FDG Cl+Dx 5.5 9.10 209 380
Lima et al. (Swiss, 2018) [17] SPECT/CT and PET/CT 99mTc and 18F-FDG AC-AL 2 40 1 10
This project LDRL SPECT/CT 99mTc AC 1.03 24.33
This project LDRL PET/CT 82RB AC-AL 7.32 207.76

Abbreviation: DE; Germany, UK; United Kingdom; JP; Japan; Swiss; Switzerland, Cl; clinical, and Dx; diagnostic CT.