Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;10(2):100. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020100

Table 2.

Effect of dietary treatments on the body weight and the relative weight1 of liver, spleen, bursa of Fabricius of ducks.

Variables Group Day 14 Day 28 Day 42
Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM
Body weight (g) C 313.60 15.75 1160.40 66.21 2393.00 a 80.23
MO 307.60 23.18 1184.80 38.40 2102.75 b 42.53
MSC 268.40 23.99 1090.40 40.53 2262.00 ab 52.54
MS 355.20 32.61 1216.00 29.83 2152.50 ab 52.42
Significance NS NS p < 0.05
Liver relative weight (%) C 4.55 0.42 2.73 0.20 2.72 0.06
MO 4.15 0.07 2.79 0.15 2.34 0.09
MSC 4.55 0.32 2.54 0.11 2.54 0.09
MS 4.12 0.22 2.74 0.11 2.67 0.16
Significance NS NS NS
Spleen relative weight (%) C 0.09 0.01 0.10 a 0.01 0.06 0.01
MO 0.10 0.02 0.07 ab 0.01 0.07 0.01
MSC 0.09 0.02 0.06 b 0.01 0.07 0.01
MS 0.11 0.00 0.08 ab 0.01 0.07 0.01
Significance NS p < 0.05 NS
Bursa of Fabricius relative weight (%) C 0.18 0.03 0.13 ab 0.01 0.11 0.01
MO 0.19 0.02 0.14 a 0.01 0.11 0.01
MSC 0.19 0.04 0.11 ab 0.01 0.12 0.01
MS 0.22 0.03 0.09 b 0.01 0.11 0.01
Significance NS p < 0.05 NS

C: control, MO: milk thistle oil, MSC: milk thistle seed cake, MS: milk thistle seed; NS: non-significant (p > 0.05). 1 Weight of organs in relation to body weight; ab Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).