Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 11;15(4):915. doi: 10.3390/nu15040915

Table 1.

Vitamin C status relative to age.

Reference Population
(Location)
n Age (Years) Vitamin C Intake (mg/d) Vitamin C
Status
(µmol/L)
Vitamin C Deficiency (%) p-Value a
Younger adults vs. older adults
Powers 2023 [16] 4932 representative sampling of non-institutionalised population (NHANES, USA) 1463 20–39 NR 48 (45, 52) 7 (5, 9) <0.001
1563 40–59 49 (46, 53) 6 (4, 9)
1906 ≥60 57 (53, 61) 7 (5, 10)
Crook 2021 [17] 7607 representative sampling of non-institutionalised population (NHANES, USA) 2751 20–39 NR NR 7 ± 1
2295 40–59 8 ± 1
2561 ≥60 5 ± 1 <0.001
Schleicher 2009 [18] 4438 representative sampling of noninstitutionalised population (NHANES, USA) 725/815 b 20–39 NR 42/49 b 11/8 b
628/638 40–59 43/52 11/8
800/832 ≥60 53/63 7/4 <0.001
Faure 2006 [19] 7074 people enrolled in the SU.VI.MAX study (France) 109/1798 b 35–45 99/95 b 53/59 b NR
1006/1222 45–50 101/97 54/61
1375/1349 50–60 100/98 55/61
113/102 60–63 104/101 54/63 0.6
Galan 2005 [20] 3128 people enrolled in the SU.VI.MAX study (France) NR <45 NR NR/60 b NR
45–50 50/60
50–55 50/59
>55 51/62 0.6/0.9 b
Nakamura 2006 [21] 76 healthy non-smoking people (USA) 31 19–30 297 ± 278 c 31 ± 8 NR
45 59–86 565 ± 463 36 ± 12 0.02
Heseker 1994 [22] 2006 healthy people (Germany) 396/558 b 18–39 101/103 b RC –0.21/–0.005 b NR 0.001/0.4 b
270/370 40–59 85/101
196/216 60–88 87/108
Newton 1985 [23] 139 young and active older women (UK) 72 ~36 NR 54 ± 22 NR NR
57 ~73 58 (18–156) 44 ± 28
Sasaki 1983 [24] 217 healthy people (Japan) 96/122 b 12–96 NR r –0.453/–0.526 b NR <0.001
McClean 1976 [25] 80 non-smoking men (New Zealand) 22 17–29 NR 50 NR NR
4 30–39 64
17 40–49 35
24 50–59 47
13 60–69 40
Burr 1974
[26]
34 nuns aged >65 and <65 years (UK) 22 19–63 NR 40 NR
12 69–89 24 <0.01
Hospitalised
Sharma 2019 [27] 147 general medical inpatients (Australia) 19 25–45 NR NR 53 d 0.03
28 45–65 75
100 >65 82
Forster 2005 [28] 322 randomly selected hospitalised patients (UK) 129 <75 NR 21 (19, 36) NR
193 ≥75 15 (5, 33) <0.01
Older adults vs. the very old
Jungert 2020 [29] 399 people aged ≥60 years (Germany) 399 60–96 CE 0.001 CE –0.075 NR NS
Ravindran 2011 [30] 7228 randomly sampled clusters of rural and urban populations (India) 985/1080 c 60–64 NR NR 69/37 e
658/864 65–69 72/39
552/575 70–74 81/42
287/275 75–79 79/45
186/176 ≥80 85/51 <0.001
Birlouez-Aragon 2001 [31] 1987 people aged >60 years (France) 189/276 b 60–64 NR ↓/X b ↑/X b 0.02/0.2 b
192/251 65–69
142/253 70–74
63/118 75–79
54/86 >80
Mecocci 2000 [32] 107 community-dwelling people
(Italy)
24 <60 NR 58 ± 3 NR
34 60–79 53 ± 3
17 80–99 42 ± 2 <0.01
32 ≥100 30 ± 2 <0.01
Barnes 1990 [33] 139 older people aged 60 to 90 years (USA) 54 60–70 NR 79 ± 32 NR
56 71–80 87 ± 37
29 81–90 79 ± 44 NS
Mandal 1987 [34] 277 older people newly admitted to assessment geriatric ward (UK) 58 65–74 NR NR 40 NR
143 75–84 40
76 ≥85 41

Data represent mean and SD or SEM, or median (Q1, Q3) or (95% CI). ap-value is for vitamin C status (or % deficiency); b—male/female; c includes supplements; d—low levels (<28 µmol/L); and e North/South India. NR—not reported; NS—not significant; ↑—increase; ↓—decrease; X—no change; CE—coefficient estimate; RC—regression coefficient; NHANES—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; and SU.VI.MAX—Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants.