Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;12(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041619

Table 1.

The impact of different factors on VISTA H-score (protein) level. Clinical characteristics of the 71-patient group with H-score.

Clinical Factor p
N (%)
Sex Female 22 (31.0) 0.7
Male 49 (69.0)
Median (range)
Age 60 (30–90) 0.99
0 = no, 1 = yes (%), NA = not available
Radiotherapy 0: 32 (45.1) 1: 36 (50.7) NA: 2 (2.8) 0.72
Chemotherapy 0: 62 (87.3) 1: 6 (8.5) NA: 2 (2.8) 0.25
Surgical resection 0: 16 (22.5) 1: 55 (77.5) 0.07
(1–3):N(%)
Grade 1: 32 (45.1) 2: 32 (45.1) 3: 7 (9.9) 0.51
(1–4):N(%)
AJCC Stage 1: 17 (23.9) 2: 15 (21.1) 3: 12 (16.9) 4: 27 (38.0) 0.66
T (1–4):N(%), N (0–3):N(%)
Classification T 1: 12 (16.9) 2: 26 (36.6) 3: 14 (19.7) 4: 19 (26.8) 0.86
N 0: 29 (40.8) 1: 13 (18.3) 2: 25 (35.2) 3: 4 (5.6) 0.82

For the group of patients, p-value was estimated to find any significant difference in VISTA expression level according to Grade, AJCC Stage, T and N classifications with the Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA test, and according to other parameters with the Mann–Whitney U test.