Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):204. doi: 10.3390/membranes13020204

Table 3.

Photocatalytic activity of different photocatalysts.

Pollutant
(mg/L)
Photocatalyst
(g/L)
Synthesis Technique Visible Light Source Degradation Efficiency
(%)
Degradation Time (min) Ref.
Acetaminophen (ACT) (10 mg/L) N-H95T5
(0.5 g/L)
Electrospinning + nitriding Halogen linear lamp 95 270 This work
ACT (10 mg/L) H95T5
(0.5 g/L)
Sol-gel
+
electrospinning
Halogen linear lamp 91 360 [25]
Rhodamine B
(10 mg/L)
N-TiO2
(1g/L)
Sol-gel + ammonia treatment 500 W mercury lamp 90 120 [22]
Gaseous toluene N–TiO2 Sol-gel + ammonia atmosphere treatment 150 W Xe lamp with an IR cutter 48 60 [21]
Rhodamine B
(20 mg/L)
N-TiO2
(1g/L)
Microemulsion−
hydrothermal method
1000 W halogen lamp 96 60 [44]
2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP)
(100 mg/L)
56 300
Methyl Orange (MO)
(20 mg/L)
N-TiO2-400
(0.062 g/L)
Precipitation + ammonium hydroxide Visible light 52 836 [45]
2,4-DCP
(100 mg/L)
N-TiO2
(1g/L)
Sol-gel+ NH4NO3/NH3 H2O 1000 W halogen lamp 52 300 [24]
ACT
(5 mg/L)
N-TiO2-NTs
(0.5g/L)
ALD + nitriding Halogen linear lamp 98 90 [34]
MO
(9.8 mg/L)
N-TiO2
(1g/L)
Solid state dispersion + urea Solar light 91 90 [46]
Methylene Blue (MB)
(10 mg/L)
N-TiO2
(1g/L)
Wet chemical method + urea Visible light 72 180 [47]