Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2022 Aug 27;43(3):271–276. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01487-2

Table 2.

Primary and Secondary Outcomes

Outcome Ondansetron (N=45) Placebo (N=41) Difference (95% CI) a P Value
Primary outcome
Need for morphine to treat NOWS – #. (%) 22 (49%) 26 (63%) −4 0.2c
Secondary outcomes
Mean hospital stay (range) 15.5 (2 to 64) 17.4 (3 to 63) −1.9 (−8.0 to 4.3) 0.56d
Mean hospital stay (range) with a 15-day maximume 9.3 (2 to 15) 11.2 (3 to 15) −1.9 (−4.0 to 0.2) 0.07
Median dose of morphine in 15 days (range) – mg 9.3 (0.8 to 37.4) 11.1 (0.8 to 31.1) −1.8 (−8.8 to 2.7) 0.31d
Mean modified Finnegan scoreb (standard deviation) 4.6 (1.6) 5.6 (2.1) −1.0 (−1.8 to −0.2) 0.02f
Use of adjunctive medicationg to treat NOWS – # (%) 5 (11%) 5 (12%) 0 1c
a

The 95% confidence interval (CI) between the ondansetron group and the placebo group was calculated with the use of Hodges-Lehmann estimator.

b

The modified Finnegan score of a neonate is represented by the mean of all modified Finnegan scores recorded for that neonate. The mean modified Finnegan score by ondansetron/placebo allocation reported in the table is the mean of all neonates’ scores in the corresponding allocation.

c

Fishers exact test.

d

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test

e

By capping the maximum stay at 15 days, the statistical significance of the treatment effect is improved.

f

Two-sample t-test.

g

phenobarbital or clonidine