Table 3.
Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form for cohort studies.
| Reference |
Selection | Comparability | Outcome | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness | Selection non-exposed | Ascertainment | Demonstration | Assessment | Follow-up | Adequacy | Quality | ||
| Akhtar et al. (18) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Al-Hourani et al. (32) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Bonatus et al. (20) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Court-Brown et al. (21) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Good |
| Duyos et al. (6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Good |
| Gaebler et al. (22) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Henley et al. (23) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Howard et al. (24) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Jenny et al. (25) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Good |
| Kakar & Tornetta (26) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Keating et al. (27) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Singh et al. (28) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Tabatabaei et al. (29) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Good |
| Whittle et al. (30) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
| Wiss (31) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good |
This work is licensed under a