Table 3.
Criteria to assess information as trustworthy (multiple selection possible) |
Participants, n (%) (Total N = 636; no information 37) |
|
---|---|---|
Criteria for evidence-based health information [9] | Information sources / references are provided | 539 (84.7) |
Development process is described (e.g. literature searches) | 375 (59.0) | |
Authors are named | 354 (55.7) | |
Information is up to date | 330 (51.9) | |
Funding and competing interests are reported | 232 (36.5) | |
Other criteria | Information was developed by an expert | 303 (47.6) |
Information was recommended by my physician | 188 (29.6) | |
Information is attractive and the design appears sound | 51 (8.0) | |
The information is widely used (at the top of Google search) | 13 (2.0) | |
Information was helpful for a relative or friend in a healthcare decision | 13 (2.0) | |
Other | 33 (5.2) |