Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;13:3322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30454-w

Table 3.

Ultrasound access and use in low- and middle-income countries.

N (%)
Ultrasound access and use in current setting (N = 184)
Access 161 (87.5)
No access 23 (12.5)
Number of ultrasound machines (N = 154)
Mean (standard deviation), minimum, median, maximum 2.9 (4.6), 1, 2, 50
N (%)
Type(s) of ultrasound machine(s) (N = 160)
Portable 82 (51.3)
Not portable 25 (15.6)
Both portable and not portable 53 (33.1)
Handheld portable ultrasound machine (N = 134)
Yes 68 (50.8)
No 66 (49.3)
Type(s) of ultrasound probe(s)* (N = 157)
Linear 129 (82.2)
Curved 119 (75.8)
Phased array 70 (44.6)
Multi-use probe 33 (21.0)
Endocavitary 25 (15.9)
Other type of probe 6 (3.8)
Ultrasound use frequency (N = 183)
Daily 84 (45.9)
Weekly 47 (25.7)
Monthly 11 (6.0)
Every few months 10 (5.5)
Rarely 14 (7.7)
Never 17 (9.3)
Ultrasound use indication(s)* (N = 177)
IV insertion 109 (61.6)
Lung 103 (58.2)
Cardiac/echocardiography 98 (55.4)
Trauma/focused assessment for trauma (FAST) 76 (42.9)
Thoracentesis 70 (39.6)
Paracentesis 58 (32.8)
Kidney and/or bladder 52 (29.4)
Skin and soft tissue 47 (26.6)
Gallbladder 46 (26.0)
Pericardiocentesis 42 (23.7)
Obstetrics and/or gynecology 40 (22.6)
Nerve block 39 (22.0)
Musculoskeletal 32 (18.1)
Abdominal aortic aneurysm 24 (13.6)
Other indication 31 (17.5)
Workplace policies/guidelines (N = 157)
Yes 53 (33.8)
No 104 (66.2)

*Total percentage for individual question may be over 100% due to “Check all that apply” option for that question on the survey. The value for N provided for “Check all that apply” questions represents the number of respondents.