Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;13:3322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30454-w

Table 5.

Respondent opinions on ultrasound use in low- and middle-income countries.

N (%)
Reason(s) for ultrasound access being viewed as a barrier* (N = 53)
Ultrasound machine unavailable 28 (52.8)
Ultrasound probe unavailable 27 (50.9)
Competition for use by different departments 20 (37.7)
Competition for use in the same department 14 (26.4)
Other reason 7 (13.2)
Location of ultrasound expert if access to support from an ultrasound expert for ongoing mentoring/training is viewed as a facilitator (N = 60)
Local 50 (83.3)
Remote 10 (16.7)
Importance of having ultrasound access (N = 162)
Very important 114 (70.4)
Important 16 (9.9)
Neither important nor unimportant 1 (0.6)
Unimportant 0 (0.0)
Very unimportant 31 (19.1)
Ultrasound improves quality of care (N = 163)
Strongly agree 134 (82.2)
Agree 23 (14.1)
Neither agree nor disagree 0 (0.0)
Disagree 0 (0.0)
Strongly disagree 6 (3.7)
Ultrasound improves patient outcomes (N = 163)
Strongly agree 105 (64.4)
Agree 51 (31.3)
Neither agree nor disagree 4 (2.5)
Disagree 0 (0.0)
Strongly disagree 3 (1.8)
Fear(s)/reservation(s) associated with ultrasound use (N = 163)
Yes 30 (18.4)
No 133 (81.6)
Types of fear(s)/reservation(s) associated with ultrasound use* (N = 28)
Misdiagnosis 20 (71.4)
Malpractice 5 (17.9)
Leadership/administration not supporting use 5 (17.9)
Peers not supporting use 4 (14.3)
Patients not understanding technology 3 (10.7)
Other fear/reservation 5 (17.9)

*Total percentage for individual question may be over 100% due to “Check all that apply” option for that question on the survey. The value for N provided for “Check all that apply” questions represents the number of respondents.