Incidence |
70% |
10% |
10% |
3% |
<5% |
Prat et al. (2018)
|
Commonly mutated genes |
Near-ubiquitous TP53 mutations |
ARID1A most frequently mutated (50%–60% of cases) |
ARID1A mutated in up to 30% of cases |
KRAS and NRAS frequently mutated |
BRAF, KRAS and NRAS commonly mutated |
Shaw et al. (2002), Risch et al.(2006), Jones et al. (2010), The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, (2011), McAlpine et al. (2012), Emmanuel et al. (2014), Kanchi et al. (2014), Hunter et al. (2015), Friedlander et al. (2016), Itamochi et al. (2017), Maru et al. (2017), Murakami et al. (2017), Kim et al. (2018), Shibuya et al. (2018), Cybulska et al. (2019), Cheasley et al. (2019), Morice, et al. (2019), Gorringe et al. (2020), Pierson et al. (2020), Cheasley et al. (2022)
|
BRCA1/2 germline mutations or inactivation |
PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, SMARCA4 also mutated |
PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, CTNNB1 also mutated |
Mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA
|
TP53 mutations rare |
|
TP53 mutations in up to 20% of cases |
TP53 mutations in ∼17% of cases |
Amplification of ERBB2 and copy number loss of CDKN2A
|
|
|
|
|
TP53 mutations in up to 64% of cases, often confined to later stages |
|
Precursor lesions |
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions in the fallopian tube |
Endometriosis and retrograde menstruation, adenofibroma |
Endometriosis and retrograde menstruation, adenofibroma |
Mucinous benign cystadenomas and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (MBTs) |
Serous borderline tumors (SBTs) in 60%–80% of cases |
Lee et al. (2007), Medeiros et al. (2006), Kurman and Shih, (2010), Wiegand et al. (2010), Erickson et al. (2013), Ahn et al. (2016), Prat et al. (2018), Cheasley et al. (2019), Shih et al. (2021)
|
Response to chemotherapy |
Initially responsive (80%) but 20%–30% of tumors relapse 6 months after treatment and can develop resistance |
Poor response (15%) and resistance to platinum chemotherapy noted |
High grade ENOCs initially sensitive to platinum chemotherapy |
Intermediate response (15%–60%) and resistance to platinum chemotherapy noted |
Poor response (26%–28%) |
Sugiyama et al. (2000), Gershenson et al. (2009), Alexandre et al. (2010), Berns and Bowtell, (2012), Kim et al. (2012), Prat et al. (2018), Lheureux et al. (2019a), Morice et al. (2019)
|
Clinical outcome |
Poor survival rates due to overall later stage diagnosis and recurrent tumors after chemotherapy |
Intermediate, with a greater risk of venous thromboembolism than other subtypes. Late stage CCOC has a poorer prognosis than late stage HGSOC |
Low grade ENOC more prevalent and favourable, poorer outcomes in high grade ENOC cases |
As 65%–80% are diagnosed at an early stage, survival is favourable, later stages have a poorer prognosis than late stage HGSOC |
Most favourable outcomes of all subtypes, along with low-grade endometrioid carcinoma |
Mackay et al. (2010), Berns and Bowtell, (2012), Peres et al. (2018), Prat et al. (2018), Ricciardi et al. (2018), Soyama et al. (2018), Morice et al. (2019)
|