Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;11:1130099. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130099

Table 5.

Association between caregiver experience and care recipient cognitive test performance among care recipients without dementia diagnosis.

Practical care burden Positive care experiences Emotional care burden
B (95% CI) p B (95% CI) p B (95% CI) p
Model 1
Rate memory 0.02 (−0.004, 0.05) 0.091 −0.04 (−0.10, 0.01) 0.118 −0.02 (−0.09, 0.05) 0.550
Immediate word recall −0.07 (−0.10, −0.03) 0.001 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) 0.151 −0.05 (−0.14, 0.05) 0.337
Delay word recall −0.10 (−0.14, −0.06) < 0.001 −0.03 (−0.11, 0.05) 0.478 −0.02 (−0.12, 0.08) 0.707
Clock Draw −0.03 (−0.06, 0.01) 0.153 0.01 (−0.03, 0.06) 0.552 −0.04 (−0.11, 0.03) 0.296
Model 2
Rate memory −0.005 (−0.04, 0.03) 0.778 −0.02 (−0.08, 0.04) 0.486 −0.02 (−0.10, 0.06) 0.623
Immediate word recall −0.07 (−0.12, −0.01) 0.014 −0.05 (−0.13, 0.03) 0.238 −0.002 (−0.10, 0.10) 0.971
Delayed word recall −0.10 (−0.16, −0.05) 0.001 −0.05 (−0.15, 0.06) 0.356 0.02 (−0.10, 0.14) 0.721
Clock Draw −0.02 (−0.06, 0.03) 0.471 −0.02 (−0.08, 0.04) 0.582 −0.02 (−0.12, 0.07) 0.613

Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, education, race, depression, and anxiety symptoms.

Model 1: Rate memory, n = 1,027, pop n = 114,831,880; Immediate word recall, n = 1,040, pop n = 114,831,880; Delayed word recall, n = 1,038, pop n = 114,831,880; Clock Draw, n = 1,032, pop n = 114,831,880. Model 2: Rate memory, n = 644, pop n = 112,148,522; Immediate word recall, n = 652, pop n = 112,100,582; Delayed word recall, n = 650, pop n = 112,100,582; Clock Draw, n = 647, pop n = 112,100,582.