Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;102(4):102529. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102529

Table 1.

Body weight of chickens and number of E. coli in the caecum of chickens in control (CTRL) and experimental (Exp) group.

Body weight (g)
E. coli counts (log CFU/g of caecum)a
Experimental strain detection (number of positive chicken, colonization rateb)
Week Exp CTRL Exp CTRL Exp CTRL
1 126.4 ± 8.2 111.0 ± 17.8 6.38 ± 0.45* 8.29 ± 0.70 ND 7/7 (+++)
2 306.4 ± 90.9 262.3 ± 61.9 6.04 ± 0.47* 7.83 ± 0.84 ND 7/7 (+++)
3 743.6 ± 184.5 728.1 ± 88.0 6.58 ± 0.70 6.46 ± 0.89 ND 3/7 (++)
4 849.0 ± 193.6 704.1 ± 51.9 5.10 ± 1.23 6.08 ± 1.17 1/7 (+) 4/7 (++)

Significantly different from control group of the same age by ANOVA with post hoc Tuckey test.

a

E. coli growing on a medium with ciprofloxacin.

b

Experimental strain detected in 10−6 to 10−5 dilution (+++), 10−4 to 10−3 dilution (++), 10−2 to 10−1 dilution (+), ND – not detected in any dilution.