Table 5.
Analysis of variance of DDS with post hoc Tukey HSD results
| Dietary diversity scores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Category | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum |
| Member Group | |||||
| Adult male | Peri-urban | 4.330 | 1.184 | 2 | 8 |
| Urban | 4.347 | 1.184 | 1 | 8 | |
| Adult female | Peri-urban | 4.100* | 1.207 | 2 | 8 |
| Urban | 4.347 | 1.174 | 2 | 8 | |
| Adolescent male | Peri-urban | 4.292 | 1.331 | 2 | 8 |
| Urban | 4.271 | 1.189 | 2 | 7 | |
| Adolescent female | Peri-urban | 4.520 | 1.343 | 2 | 9 |
| Urban | 4.504 | 1.371 | 2 | 8 | |
| Location | |||||
| Urban | Adult male | 4.347a | 1.184 | 1 | 8 |
| Adult female | 4.347a | 1.174 | 2 | 8 | |
| Adolescent male | 4.271a | 1.189 | 2 | 7 | |
| Adolescent female | 4.504a | 1.371 | 2 | 8 | |
| Peri-urban | Adult male | 4.330a | 1.184 | 2 | 8 |
| Adult female | 4.100b | 1.207 | 2 | 8 | |
| Adolescent male | 4.292a,b | 1.331 | 2 | 8 | |
| Adolescent female | 4.520a | 1.343 | 2 | 9 | |
*Mean values were significantly different as determined by independent t-tests (p < 0.0125)
a,bMean values with different superscript letters were significantly different as determined by ANOVA with post hoc Tukey HSD test (adjusted p < 0.05)