Table 2.
Evaluation criteria for DS-RPM1
| Criterion | Item |
|---|---|
| Functional requirements | Diagnosis(es) suggested for the given case were appropriate |
| Treatments suggested for the diagnosis were appropriate and evidence based | |
| Explanations for triage, diagnosis, and treatment were useful and appropriate | |
| References suggested were appropriate and current | |
| Error messages were useful and appropriate | |
| Usability | The decision support tool was understandable |
| The tool was easy to learn to use | |
| The tool was efficient to operate when used repeatedly | |
| The interface and output were grammatically correct without spelling errors | |
| Acceptability | Overall, the tool functions as intended |
| I would use this application in my practice | |
| I would recommend this application to my colleagues |
1Questions use a Likert Scale: 1 = disagree strongly; 2 = disagree somewhat; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree somewhat; 5 = agree strongly, 0 = not applicable. Each item is accompanied by a text field of unlimited size where the user can elaborate on their preceding response