Table 2.
Distribution of regional and local schemes by main design, implementation and outcome features
| Policy design | Yes | No | Policy implementation | Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application of energy efficiency criteria | 103 | 48 | Known budgetary sources | 105 | 46 | |
| of which: | Secured EU support | 77 | 74 | |||
| Minimum energy savings | 35 | Disclosed implementation period | 145 | 6 | ||
| Energy class improvement | 19 | started before 2000 | 1 | |||
| National building codes | 10 | …between 2000–2010 | 8 | |||
| Maximum energy demand | 4 | …between 2010–2015 | 35 | |||
| Positive energy building | 1 | …between 2015–2020 | 78 | |||
| Prescriptive criteria | 14 | started after 2020 | 2 | |||
| Other | 14 | Known dissemination channels | 143 | 8 | ||
| Known intervention measures | 146 | 5 | of which: | |||
| of which: | Website | 103 | ||||
| Upgrade of technical systems | 90 | Press release | 52 | |||
| Insulation of building envelope | 86 | Mass campaign | 28 | |||
| Installation of RES systems | 61 | Tailored advertising (by post, phone, etc.) | 14 | |||
| Installation of control systems | 46 | Training or toolkit | 6 | |||
| Others | 35 | Policy outcomes | Yes | No | ||
| Declared target renovation depth | 92 | 59 | Known qualitative impact | 66 | 85 | |
| of which: | of which: | |||||
| high | 38 | High | 32 | |||
| medium | 47 | Medium | 22 | |||
| low | 7 | Low | 12 | |||
| Disclosed beneficiaries | 145 | 6 | Known quantitative impact | 91 | 60 | |
| of which: | of which: | |||||
| Homeowners | 57 | Number of buildings | 77 | |||
| Landlords or tenants | 21 | Number of interventions | 65 | |||
| Housing or social housing associations | 22 | Number of applications | 65 | |||
| SMEs | 11 | Energy savings | 66 | |||
| Business owners | 14 | GHG reduction | 62 | |||
| Public authorities | 63 | Other benefits | 51 |