Table 7.

Summary of robust post-hoc comparisons between temperament-character networks.

Variable	Comparison
	network		Network	$\widehat{\phi }$	CI	p
Panel A: adult sample
Positive Affect	Emotional-unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	− 0.13	[− 0.29, 0.02]	0.037
		–	Creative-reliable	− 0.47	[− 0.63, − 0.30]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	− 0.33	[− 0.51, − 0.16]	< 0.001
Negative affect	Emotional-Unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	0.63	[0.49, 0.77]	< 0.001
		–	Creative-reliable	0.74	[0.60, 0.89]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	0.11	[− 0.02, 0.25]	0.047
Life satisfaction	Emotional-Unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	− 0.34	[− 0.43, − 0.26]	< 0.001
		–	Creative-Reliable	− 0.38	[− 0.49, − 0.26]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	− 0.03	[− 0.15, 0.09]	0.526
Panel B: adolescent sample
Positive affect	Emotional-unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	− 0.40	[− 0.51, − 0.28]	< 0.001
		–	Creative-reliable	− 0.63	[− 0.74, − 0.52]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	− 0.23	[− 0.36, 0.11]	< 0.001
Negative affect	Emotional-unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	0.84	[0.74, 0.95]	< 0.001
		–	Creative-reliable	0.61	[0.50, 0.72]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	− 0.23	[− 0.33, − 0.13]	< 0.001
Life satisfaction	Emotional-unreliable	–	Organized-reliable	− 1.03	[− 1.17, − 0.89]	< 0.001
		–	Creative-Reliable	− 1.06	[− 1.19, − 0.92]	< 0.001
	Organized-reliable	–	Creative-reliable	− 0.03	[− 0.14, 0.09]	0.596