Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;17:11786302231156299. doi: 10.1177/11786302231156299

Table 2.

Handwashing practice of students by gender at 2 critical times in schools of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2020.

Variables Categories Before eating (N = 192) After defecation (N = 192) Total (N = 384)
Male, Number (%) Female, Number (%) Total, Number (%) Male, Number (%) Female, Number (%) Total, Number (%) Male, Number (%) Female, Number (%) Total, Number (%)
Students using handwashing facilities, N = 384 Yes 64 (33.3) 81 (42.2) 145 (75.5) 63 (32.8) 74 (38.5) 137 (71.4) 127 (33.1) 155 (40.3) 282 (73.4)
No 32 (16.7) 15 (7.8) 47 (24.5) 33 (17.2) 22 (11.5) 55 (28.6) 65 (16.9) 37 (9.6) 102 (26.6)
No of students who used soap, N = 282 Yes 39 (26.9) 72 (49.7) 111 (76.6) 38 (27.8) 64 (46.7) 102 (74.5) 77 (27.3) 136 (48.2) 213 (75.5)
No 25 (17.2) 9 (6.2) 34 (23.4) 25 (18.2) 10 (7.3) 35 (25.5) 50 (17.7) 19 (6.7) 69 (24.5)
Techniques of handwashing, N = 282 One hand 29 (20) 15 (10.3) 44 (30.3) 29 (21.2) 20 (14.6) 49 (35.8) 58 (20.6) 35(12.4) 93 (33)
Two hands 35 (24.1) 66 (45.5) 101 (69.7) 34 (24.8) 54 (39.4) 88 (64.2) 69 (24.5) 120 (42.6) 189 (67)
The status of handwashing practice, N = 384 Good 23 (12) 42 (21.9) 65 (33.9) 25 (13) 45 (23.4) 70 (36.5) 48 (12.5) 87 (22.7) 135 (35.2)
Poor 73 (38) 54 (28.1) 127 (66.1) 71 (37) 51 (26.5) 122 (63.5) 144 (37.5) 105 27.3) 249 (64.8)