Table 3.
Logistic and Ordinary Least Squares Regressions Predicting NCDII Outcomes.
| NCDII Perpetration |
Perpetrator Legal
Consequences |
Perpetrator School
Consequences |
Victim File Police
Report |
Perpetrator Likelihood of B eing
Caught (OLS) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | SE | OR | SE | OR | SE | OR | SE | Coef. | SE | |
| Man | 1.23 | (0.310) | 1.06 | (0.200) | 0.99 | (0.201) | 0.64* | (0.130) | 0.68 | (2.371) |
| Age | 0.87 | (0.105) | 0.93 | (0.083) | 0.96 | (0.089) | 1.13 | (0.112) | 0.53 | (1.119) |
| Race/ethnicity | ||||||||||
| Asian | 0.36 | (0.199) | 1.13 | (0.341) | 1.29 | (0.415) | 1.22 | (0.432) | 8.51* | (3.783) |
| Black | 1.11 | (0.444) | 0.99 | (0.328) | 0.47* | (0.161) | 1.49 | (0.592) | 4.81 | (4.248) |
| Hispanic | 0.66 | (0.269) | 0.71 | (0.216) | 1.44 | (0.496) | 1.40 | (0.494) | 8.12* | (3.818) |
| Other | 0.45 | (0.354) | 0.55 | (0.252) | 1.41 | (0.698) | 0.60 | (0.286) | 11.76* | (5.638) |
| Upperclassman | 1.10 | (0.350) | 1.35 | (0.326) | 0.67 | (0.173) | 1.16 | (0.306) | −6.10* | (3.038) |
| Single | 1.48 | (0.337) | 0.91 | (0.157) | 1.14 | (0.208) | 1.77** | (0.334) | 2.13 | (2.172) |
| NCDII victimization | 1.58* | (0.367) | 1.01 | (0.197) | 1.24 | (0.261) | 0.64* | (0.136) | −1.46 | (2.473) |
| NCDII perpetration | . | . | 0.96 | (0.205) | 1.15 | (0.265) | 0.69 | (0.160) | 1.15 | (2.707) |
| Sent intimate image | 1.27 | (0.303) | 0.97 | (0.178) | 1.36 | (0.267) | 1.11 | (0.223) | 2.26 | (2.322) |
| Received unsolicited image | 1.90* | (0.500) | 1.07 | (0.196) | 1.38 | (0.271) | 1.53* | (0.307) | −0.61 | (2.294) |
| Sent image to stranger | 1.59 | (0.385) | 1.00 | (0.207) | 0.80 | (0.174) | 0.82 | (0.185) | −2.64 | (2.599) |
| Perceived % NCDII victims | 1.00 | (0.006) | 1.00 | (0.005) | 0.99 | (0.005) | 1.01 | (0.006) | 0.11 | (0.062) |
| Perceived % NCDII perpetrators | 1.03*** | (0.006) | 0.99* | (0.005) | 1.00 | (0.005) | 0.99 | (0.005) | −0.04 | (0.058) |
| Stopped by police | 1.71* | (0.412) | 1.21 | (0.240) | 0.93 | (0.194) | 0.69 | (0.144) | −1.08 | (2.482) |
| Police NCDII ability | 1.08 | (0.111) | 1.45*** | (0.117) | 1.71*** | (0.152) | 1.52*** | (0.136) | 6.66*** | (0.977) |
| Police overall ability | 0.96 | (0.075) | 0.93 | (0.057) | 0.89 | (0.059) | 0.77*** | (0.053) | 0.68 | (0.762) |
| Institutional NCDII ability | 0.83* | (0.076) | 1.13 | (0.079) | 1.02 | (0.074) | 0.94 | (0.072) | 0.50 | (0.871) |
| Constant | 0.31 | (0.626) | 4.12 | (6.206) | 8.72 | (13.699) | 0.11 | (0.179) | 29.47 | (18.965) |
Note. Models 1–4 include 713 observations; Model 5 includes 693 due to missingness on the dependent variable. NCDII = nonconsensual distribution of intimate images.
***
p < 0.001. **p < 0.01. *p < 0.05.