Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Metab. 2021 Aug 20;3(8):1042–1057. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00439-y

Extended Data Fig. 3 |. Fecal bomb calorimetry and rectal temperature of lab and wildling mice on chow and HFD.

Extended Data Fig. 3 |

a, b, Food energy intake (a) and fecal energy loss (bomb calorimetry) (b) in female lab or wildling mice on chow or HFD. N = 40 mice on chow and n = 40 mice on HFD examined per group over two independent experiments. c, Rectal temperature of male lab or wildling mice at week 9 of chow or HFD. N = 15 lab mice on chow, n = 20 lab mice on HFD, n = 17 wildlings on chow, n = 21 wildlings on HFD examined over two independent experiments. Box plots show median (center line), 75th (upper limit of box) and 25th percentile (lower limit of box) and outliers (whiskers) if values do not exceed 1.5-times interquartile range. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test (NS, not significant; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, exact p-values are shown in the Source Data).