Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):e0000201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000201

Table 5. Key findings of the outcome measures in the eight included studies.

Authors Control ppFEV1 CFQ-R Physical domain CFQ-R Respiratory domain
Carr et al., (2018) [32] Standard care control group Increased 1.47% predicted No significant differences reported No significant differences reported
Chen et al., (2018) [26] No comparators I:pre 85L vs I:post 81.5L*** Not reported Not reported
Cox et al., (2015) [29] No comparators Not reported I:pre 36 (32–67) vs I:post 63 (29–79) (p = 0.2) I:pre 33 (27–70)
vs I:post 44 (33–71) (p = 0.2)
Hommerding et al., (2015) [27] Standard care control group I:pre (95.5+/-17.9) vs I:post (93.7+/-8.6)
C:pre (100.1+/-21.2) vs C:post (99.1+/-14.2) (p = 0.5)
Not reported Not reported
Rovedder et al., (2014) [30] Standard care control group I:pre (58.3+/-27.6) vs C:pre (57.6+/-22.7) (p = 0.709)
I:post (52.3 +/-16.1) vs C:post (55.6+/-7.3) (p = 0.306)
I:pre 58 (*45/87) vs C:pre 64 (*44/81) (p = 1.000)
I:post (64.1+/-17.50) vs C:post 2.4+/-17.50 (*-10/13) (p = 0.742)
I:pre 55 (*50/72) vs
C:pre 55 (*38/61)
(p = 0.311)
I:post **3.8+/-10.60 (*0/11)
vs C:post **-4.7+/-13.40 (*-1/7)
(p = 0.925)
Schmidt et al., (2011) [28] No comparators I:pre 87.6 (74.8;105.8)
I:post 85.0 (76.5;99.0)
(p = 0.377)
I:pre (90.8+/-14.5) vs I:post
(93.8+/-8.1)
(p = 0.346)
I:pre (77.8+/-12.7) vs I:post (76.2+/-13.5)
(p = 0.371)
Swisher et al., (2010) [31] No comparators Not reported I:pre (86.1+/-10.4) vs I:post (81.8+/-15.0) I:pre (77.5+/-10.2) vs I:post (84.7+/-10.1)
Tomlinson et al., (2020)[33] No comparators I:pre (74+/-31) vs I:post (73+/-34) I:pre 72 (34) vs I:post 58 (37). I:pre 52 (33) vs I:post 56 (23)

I = intervention; C = control; pre = pre-intervention; post = post-intervention; *Author did not report full outcome dataset PRE vs POST; +/- = standard deviation; * = Median 25/75%; ** = difference;***ppFEV1 not reported–we query this value as Litres.